Bibliography
Here we're collecting articles, books, and other materials that
you may find useful as you design and teach your writing courses. But
we've only just begun. If you have an article that you think your
colleagues would enjoy, please contact Karen Gocsik, Executive Director
of the Writing Program.
- "The Major Pedagogical Theories," James Berlin,
College English 44 (1982): 765 - 77. This seminal article rather
neatly classifies the four different methods of teaching writing,
arguing that each has very different notions about "truth," as well as
different ideas of author, audience, and language. Berlin ultimately
argues that we need to be clear about the methods we choose to teach
writing; otherwise, we risk sending students conflicting and confusing
methods about what it means to write academically.
- "Writing with Teachers: A Conversation with Peter Elbow,"
David Bartholomae, Journal of College Composition and
Communication 46.1 (Feb. 1995): 62-71. In this famous
back-and-forth, Bartholomae and Elbow argue about one of the most
persistent issues in teaching comp: Should we teach writing by
encouraging students to find their own voices (the personal/process
approach), or should teach them to acquire the values, conventions, and
voices of academic writing? The debate is enjoyable and
evocative—primarily because these two are such wonderful
writers.
- "Competing Theories of Process: A Critique and a Proposal,"
Lester Faigley, College English 48 (1986): 527-42. This article
justifies the process approach on theoretical terms.
- What the Best College Teachers Do, Ken Bain.
Bain's book is one of the best and most readable books about how and why
to employ active learning methods in your teaching. While the book does
not focus on the teaching of writing, its principles are easily applied.
- Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paolo Friere. Friere's
seminal work argues against what he calls "the banking model of
education," in which students passively receive knowledge from the
professor and instead promotes what we would now call active learning
models. (See especially Chapter Two.)
- "Cognition, Convention, and Certainty: What We Need to Know
About Writing," Patricia Bizell, Journal of Rhetorical
Theory, 3 (1982): 213-243.
- "William Perry and Liberal Education," Patricia Bizell,
College English, 46 (1984): 447-54.
- "Writing as a Mode of Learning," Janet Emig, College
Composition and Communication 28.2 (1977): 122-28. Emig argues that
writing is a distinct way of learning, different from speaking, and
significant in its differences.
- "Writing as a Way of Knowing," James McCrimmon, The
Promise of English: NCTE Distinguished Lectures, 115-130. McCrimmon
argues that writing is an effective way of mastering content in any
discipline.
- "On Students' Rights to Their Own Texts: A Model of Teacher
Response," Lil Brannon and C.H. Knoblauch, CCC 33
(1982), 157 - 166. The writers suggest a facilitative rather than
a directive approach to responding to student writing, arguing that the
facilitative approach ensures that students will retain ownership of
their writing educations.
- "Responding to Student Writing," Nancy Sommers, CCC 33
(1982): 148 - 56. Sommers, who for many years ran the Expos program at
Harvard, offers good, commonsense advice about how best to respond to
student papers.
- Anything by
Linda Flower. Using a technique called "protocol analysis," Flower
recorded what happens in a student's writing process and determined that
most young writers compose writer-based rather than reader-based prose.
In other words, they write to make sense to themselves, without fully
considering their audiences (or perhaps not considering the audience at
all). Flower's handbook, Problem-Solving Strategies for Writing
(Harcourt Brace 1998), was revolutionary in moving students to revise
their papers from writer-based to reader-based prose.
- "A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing," Linda Flower and
John Hayes, CCC 32 (1981): 365-87. This was one of the first
articles to discuss writing as a recursive process, requiring
revision.
- "Inventing the University," David Bartholomae, When a
Writer Can't Write: Studies in Writer's Block and Other
Composing-Process Problems (ed. Mike Rose). This article argues
that first-year writers must re-invent the university before they can
locate themselves within academic discourse. A stronger sense of
audience will help students to write and revise their prose.
- Style: The Basics of Clarity and Grace, Joseph
Williams. The first four chapters of this book are very useful in
helping students understand why sentences work (or don't work), and how
to make them better.
- Elements of Alternate Style, Wendy Bishop, editor and
contributor, 1997. This book has several essays that suggest ways that
students might explore alternate styles in order to see academics as
intellectual "play."
- "On the Possibility of a Unified Theory of Composition and
Literature," Patricia Bizell, Rhetoric Review 4 (1986):
174-80. Bizell proposes rhetorical study as a way of teaching writing,
with culture as the studied text.
- "Rhetorical Reading Strategies and the Construction of
Meaning," Chistina Haas and Linda Flower, CCC 39 (1988):
167-83.
- "Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key," Kathleen Blake
Yancey, CCC 57 (December 2004). An important article, in
that Yancey makes several interesting points about where composition is
going and what we must do to get there.