Essays

Table of Contents


Back to 'WISE Stories' Table of Contents


"Women in U.S. Academic Medicine: 1994 Status Report"


Compiled by Georgina Garcia '97                         May 1, 1995

The following are excerpts from an article written by Janet Bickel for the Association for Women In Science magazine, March/April 1995.

A Look at the Numbers

Did you know that only one-fifth, or 20%, of all doctors across the United States are women? Although that may seem like a small amount, considering the history of women in science, and particularly medicine, this is no small feat. Representation of women in medicine has fluctuated over time due to different circumstances. At one point in the 19th Century there were more female doctors than in the early 20th Century due to social regulation of examining female patients by females.

Currently, women make up 42% of the applicant pool to medical schools. This number has grown significantly after the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments of
1972, and appears to have plateaued at 42%. The number of men accepted in to medical school has declined since 1978, while the acceptance rate of women has risen. These numbers may not mean much to you, but to women physicians it has probably been a long wait for female companionship within the field. The number of men accepted in to medical school has declined since 1978, while the acceptance rate of women has risen.

Women in the Specialties

The percent of women entering graduate medical education programs has also been on the rise in the last thirteen years. It went from 22% in 1980 to 32% in 1993. Of the fields being entered, internal medicine comprises one-quarter of all female specialists. Other
Females may see themselves more as "care giving," nurturing physicians rather than the high drama "curing" surgeons. specialties that are increasing in numbers are dermatology, family practice, obstetrics & gynecology, and pediatrics. Even though the numbers of women have steadily increased, there is still a hint of traditional differentiation in their choice of specialty. Studies have shown that less than 8% of the women entering medical school have an interest
in pediatrics. Yet, 16% of the 31,000 women in 1993 decided to become pediatricians. Why is this happening? Investigations point to the stereotyping of women by faculty. In addition, women may chose pediatrics because of a preference to work and communicate directly with people. Females may see themselves more as "care giving," nurturing physicians rather than the high drama "curing" surgeons.

Women as Faculty

Within the medical schools themselves the females comprise roughly a quarter of the faculty. The percentages for the various levels of teaching (i.e. full professor, assistant professor, and instructors) are skewed. Fewer than 10% of the women are full professors. It is also interesting to note that the majority of the minorities come from the women faculty. By ethnicity, white women make up 76.5%, Asian 9.3%, and African American??? of the total underrepresented population in medical school faculty.

A Promising Future. . .But a Need for Improvement

Gender differences have been observed throughout the medical field. In part this is due to the structure of the field. Fundamentally, medicine is a domain dependent on
continuity for patients and hospital teams. Often the rigors of having children can disrupt this continuum. In addition, there is a need for professional skill development. In closing, there are many positive signs of growth and awareness within the medical field, but there is always need for improvement. Looking towards the future, additional mentoring programs and vast networks for women can work to strengthen and increase the pool of women entering medical school. Looking towards the future, additional mentoring programs and vast networks for women can work to strengthen and increase the pool of women entering medical school.

Back to Top


Famous Last Words...
Reflections on Science at Dartmouth


By Cristy H. Nguyen '95                         May 17, 1995

Retiring WISP administrative intern and newsletter editor Cristy Nguyen reflects on her experience as a science major at Dartmouth.

Reflections on Four Years

"I wish I had taken more opportunities to work more closely with my professors over the years, as they are so accessible and flexible and so willing to work with students..."
-Amy Naparstek '95

"I've met more people and made more friends in my science classes and labs than in any of my non-science classes. I find science to be extremely interactive, both with the subject matter and with other students and professors. In fact, next year I'll be living with two women both of whom I met as a result of science courses here at Dartmouth."
-Jane Merkel '95

"Due to the large number of individual research opportunities available here at Dartmouth, in all areas of science, you can explore a world in more detail than you may even want! I also think that there are a lot of support networks for women to turn towards when the frustrations of science can get overwhelming, WISP for example!" -Kerri Cavanaugh '95

"I have definitely felt A LOT of support here at Dartmouth for women in science, and I would not have stuck with it had I not been so encouraged." -Pam Brockmeier '95

"I am definitely glad I majored in Chemistry. The chemistry classes were always a superior challenge compared to my other Dartmouth classes, and I really grew from pushing myself so hard. Writing a thesis was also very helpful in determining whether I want to continue with research in graduate school or as my career." -Wendy Jastremski '95

"WISP was a stepping stone from which I leapt into many opportunities and experiences. I am grateful to WISP for this. I have loved my years of research here at Dartmouth, but I am excited to move on to something new. My advice to future women pursuing science is to be aggressive. Seek opportunities. Ask questions. Use your connections. A connection can be your WISP sponsor, a tech in the lab you work in, an upperclassman, a professor. These people are all valuable resources, so don't be afraid to use them. And finally, be open-minded in all of your endeavors. Keep in mind that the path you set out on may take you to a different destination than you intended. I started off at Dartmouth an engineering major, and ended up a biology major going to med school. I'm starting med school intending to become a pediatrician. Who knows where I'll end up..." -Susannah Schlichter '95

A Little Help from My Friends

As my classmates reflect on their years as women in science at Dartmouth, I think about mine and must say that I have definitely gone the gamut in terms of my feelings toward science ­ from excitement to frustration to sheer loathing, my path as a biology major has had its share of ups and downs. I also must say that I wouldn't have made it without the support and friendship of a few amazing women with whom I shared my experience as a science major.

Making Adjustments

I encountered difficulties early in my Dartmouth career, when I made the first "bad grade" of my life in multivariable calculus after my first fall term. This, in addition to an
unsupportive advisor, led to feelings of inadequacy, and it was hard not to approach my next few science courses with unnecessary fear and intimidation. I did not feel entitled to the privilege of speaking with my professors, who I figured must be busy having in-depth conversations with those students who were acing the courses. I also had not yet found my support network, and was not aware that many others also struggled with the demanding course loads. It was not until a few terms later that I finally affirmed my own ability, and gained the confidence to It was not until a few terms later that I finally affirmed my own ability, and gained the confidence to approach my classmates and professors with questions I had previously deemed unworthy.
approach my classmates and professors with questions I had previously deemed unworthy. What I discovered was a group of people who shared my desire to learn and had similar frustrations when they didn't understand, and were willing to talk things out with me.

An Opportunity for Interdisciplinary Study

I am also grateful for the opportunity to concentrate in Environmental Studies at Dartmouth. Through classes focusing on environmental science, ethics, and policy, I was able to explore the sociological implications of the concepts I was learning in my biology classes. How will the latest genetic engineering techniques affect humanity and our views on reproduction, and how will they be regulated? What are the effects of increased CO2 and temperature on plants, and what are the implications for the future of agriculture and the management of our food supplies? These ideas which enmesh science and societal issues allowed me to see that these two arenas are not mutually exclusive, and reinforced in my head the importance of science and information. Because of this exposure, I have decided to incorporate studies in Public Health, namely health policy and management, into my future career goals in medicine. I encourage all future students to take advantage of the multidisciplinary courses and opportunities available at Dartmouth.

I believe that what ultimately keeps a woman interested in science is her love of the laws of nature and how they govern the forces of the universe, the biological processes of life, the integrity of a system. Although there are many theories out there, I believe that what ultimately keeps a woman interested in science is her love of the laws of nature and how they govern the forces of the universe, the biological processes of life, the integrity of a system. This was instilled in me by my father, who would explain natural phenomena to me on our long walks, and by a biology teacher in high school, who taught with such enthusiasm that biology seemed like the only worthwhile discipline.

In addition to providing a support network for women, I believe another important facet of WISP is the ability to foster this love in aspiring women in science, who might not have had the benefits of early exposure to science that I had. Through first-year internships
and interaction with successful women working on exciting projects in all areas of science, I believe that this can be done if students take advantage of the opportunities available to them through WISP. These "successful" women may be anyone from the former Deputy to the Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs and Vice-President of the World Resources Institute (Jessica Mathews) to the new dean of the Thayer School of Engineering (Elsa Garmire) to the graduate student working on her Ph.D., whom you pass everyday in the halls on your way to class. I am proud to be a part of this effort, In addition to providing a support network for women, I believe another important facet of WISP is the ability to foster this love in aspiring women in science, who might not have had the benefits of early exposure to science that I had.
and consider my two and a half years with WISP to be time well spent! I would also like to commend everyone - from students to staff to faculty - who contribute to this effort as well, and therefore ensure the success of WISP in the years to come.

Farewell, and thanks for reading all these years.

Back to Top


And the Nobel Prize Goes To...


By Wendy Gentelman, ENGS Grad Student                         October 12, 1995

The awarding of the Nobel Prize took place this week...two American men shared the Prize in medicine along with a German woman. There aren't, however, many women scientists who have been awarded the Nobel Prize. In the following article, Wendy Gentleman, a Ph.D. student in engineering, discusses the lecture given by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne, who is the author of the book entitled Nobel Prize Women in Science.

Nine Stories

How many Nobel Prize winning women scientists can you name? Don't be overly concerned if the answer is merely a handful, the total number is hardly more than that. In
fact, of the more than 300 Nobel Prizes in science awarded since 1901, only nine have been given to women. Why so few? This was the topic discussed in a lecture given by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne, former newspaper journalist and author of the book "Nobel Prize Women in Science: Their Lives, Struggles and Momentous Discoveries". ...of the more than 300 Nobel Prizes in science awarded since 1901, only nine have been given to women.

Quoting from her novel, Ms. McGrayne gave anecdotes about each of these nine women, as well as five of the countless others for whom the prize was awarded to their male counterparts. One theme that linked each of these stories was that the greatest obstacle each of these women faced was discrimination. Women were not supposed to enjoy science, and were not supposed to be capable of scientific discovery or exploration. Those that did involve themselves in science were seen as oddities and hidden away from the rest of the university, often being restricted to the basement laboratories and attic offices. One woman was even forced to walk a block and a half down the street to use the restroom at a local hotel because she was not permitted to use the one upstairs from her work area at the university.

Obstacles at Every Turn

The scientific careers of these women were hindered at every step. Legally barred from attending universities in Europe, they were forced to hire tutors or, in extreme cases, hide beneath the benches in the auditoriums in order to hear lecturers. Some worked without pay, position, or title. While the situation was not quite as drastic in the US, where women were allowed to attend the universities, they were refused positions as researchers. Most of the women that did gain access to institutions did so under the rubric of volunteer, despite the fact that they were required to fulfill professorial duties similar to their male colleagues. When Gerty Cori was offered a paid position at 1/5 the salary of her husband, with whom she conducted research, she jumped at the opportunity. This was in 1931 at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri.

It wasn't just in the salary discrepancy that the recognition due them was minimized. Their work was often credited to the closest man working with them, be it partner or
Their work was often credited to the closest man working with them, be it partner or supervisor. supervisor. Rosalyn Yalow's male collaborator was attributed as the creative force behind their work, forcing her to reestablish her reputation following his death. Jocelyn Bell Burnell discovered pulsars as a 24-year old graduate student; her thesis advisor won a Nobel Prize.
Injustice was served Rosalind Franklin, not only in that James Watson and Francis Crick used her experimental results without her knowledge or consent, but in the inaccurate caricature with which they have immortalized her in the book Double Helix.

The Road to Success

In the face of such circumstances, it is astounding that there were indeed "so many." How did they ever manage to succeed? Interestingly enough, the success of these particular women was due in part to the support they had from men, be they husbands or mentors. There was essentially no network of support among the women in the field, as they were fearful of appearing ungracious to the men who had hired them. This continued until the 1970's with the onset of the women's movement. Mainly, their success is a result of their diligence and ambition that stemmed from their honest passion for science. Ms. McGrayne's stories were at the very least inspirational. One was struck with a sense of wonder and awe at the drive that these women had, and a desire to have one ounce of their motivation. Reminded of the Virginia Slims ad, "You've come along way baby," one couldn't help but walk away feeling somewhat invincible; ready to do honor to our predecessors. I cannot imagine a more suitable talk for the young women scientists of today who sat before Ms. Mcgrayne. Who knows? Perhaps somewhere amongst the young women scientists in the audience is the foundation for the sequel.

For more details about these women, her book can be purchased at the Dartmouth bookstore (if not in stock, it can be ordered.) At $26.95, it might be a good Christmas gift to request...

And who are the Nobel Prize women in science? Marie Sklodowska Curie (physicist and radiochemist), Gerty Radnitz Cori (biochemist), Irene Joliot-Curie (radiochemist), Barbara McClintock (geneticist), Maria Goeppert Mayer (mathematical physicist), Rita Levi-Montalcini (neuroembryologist), Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin (physical chemist), Gertrude B. Elion (biochemist), and Rosalyn Sussman Yalow (medical physicist).

Back to Top


Quilting Together a Career in Science


By Geraldine Richmond, Ph.D                         August 10, 1996

Geraldine Richmond, PhD is a professor of chemistry at the University of Oregon, Eugene. This article is excerpted from AWIS Magazine, the journal of the Association for Women in Science.

Science as a Quilt: The Origins of the Analogy

As I reflect on my early expectations of what my life would be like as a woman scientist,
one of the most unanticipated joys has been the wonderful diversity of women scientists with whom I have had the opportunity to interact. I have found women with a broad spectrum of science careers, personalities, intellectual interests, personal lives, and scientific approaches to solving problems. I marvel in the unique ways that these women have been able to construct their personal and professional lives to best fit their needs and aspirations, analogous in many ways to how a quilt maker pieces together different fabrics into a quilt. In fact, the assembly of a handmade quilt by women over the centuries has I marvel in the unique ways that these women have been able to construct their personal and professional lives to best fit their needs and aspirations, analogous in many ways to how a quilt maker pieces together different fabrics into a quilt.
many similarities with how a scientist collects facts and observations and assembles them together to obtain a picture that can explain an unknown phenomenon.

Although quiltmaking is a rather unconventional approach to describing the scientific method or how to develop a career in science, I find that exploration of this analogy provides me with a visual medium for appreciating the unique way women scientists continue to contribute to our society. It also provides "fabric for thought" on how we need to continue to work together to help the next generation of female scientists take us to new heights. So indulge with me while we explore this analogy.

All Different Patterns

It is an interesting exercise to think about what kind of quilt or quilts would represent each of us. There are women scientists whom one might categorize as very conservative in personality and approach to science, reminding me of the traditional Amish quilts comprised of geometric shapes and patterns, each piece methodically and carefully woven into an exquisite pattern. Complementing these women scientists are those who choose to be more daring and less conventional in their approach to science, more characteristic of contemporary quilts with flowing patterns and abstract images. What quilts might best represent the group of women scientists who have devoted so much of their careers and personal time to teaching science and nurturing students? One which comes to my mind is a quilt by Patricia Maixner Margaret which depicts flowers blooming, an image created by a collection of flowered fabrics which are assembled like an impressionistic painting.

Imagine a quilt show representing the diversity of scientific interests and achievements of women in industrial, government, academic, and volunteer positions, quilts of
There is no end to the unique professional careers of the women scientists around us just as the possibilities for quilt designs are endless. volcanologists, astrophysicists, neuroscientists, chemists, computer scientists, geneticists, optical engineers, paleontologists, materials scientists... There is no end to the unique professional careers of the women scientists around us just as the possibilities for quilt designs are endless. Some women's careers would consist of a series of blocks representing a variety of distinct stages or jobs in
their careers, in contrast to some women who have continued to work and grow in one particular job setting.

For some women scientists, the quilts representing their careers would be incomplete without the inclusion of fabrics representing their personal lives, reflecting the way many women scientists find their personal and professional lives inseparable. A baby quilt of Linda Denner seems to me an illustration of the woman scientist who attempts to focus analytically on her science at work, while a subconscious scroll of her children's daily schedule and needs swirls in the back of her mind.

Stitching Our Own Careers

But the most creative and interesting aspect of a quilt is not necessarily the overall image that it portrays, but rather the pieces of fabric that the quilter selects to make the image.
It is important for us to work to erase the drab and restrictive image of what a woman scientist "should be" and work to enable all women scientists to use the colorful spectrum of scientific skills, professional styles, and personality traits that they possess. Each fabric selected and its placement represents a personal decision, a personal choice. It is the collection of personal choices that not only completes the quilt, but makes the quilt unique, that makes a career one's own. Unfortunately, as women scientists we have not always had access to all possible choices in our careers, just as the quilters of the past had limited fabrics form which to choose. In fact, we must continue to labor for this freedom of choice in how to conduct our science and the access to all professional opportunities. It is important for us to work to erase the drab and restrictive image of what a woman scientist "should be" and work to enable all women
scientists to use the colorful spectrum of scientific skills, professional styles, and personality traits that they possess. We need the freedom to make choices in our
personal lives without these choices serving as the litmus test for how dedicated or serious we are about our science or careers. Just imagine how much richer and more vivid the next generation of quilts could be if all women scientists felt the freedom to display all the fabrics of their character, the freedom to be assertive, nurturing, aggressive, cheerful, serious, creative, and visionary. Imagine how many new quilt patterns might emerge if we could demolish the stereotypes which hinder career options for women scientists and which keep many girls and young women from pursuing studies in the sciences. Imagine how many new quilt patterns might emerge if we could demolish the stereotypes which hinder career options for women scientists and which keep many girls and young women from pursuing studies in the sciences.

The Principles of Quilting

So as we all reflect on our lives as women scientists, it is worthwhile to imagine how our search for personal satisfaction in our careers might be guided by the principles which guide women quilt makers. As quilter Janice Fassinger of Cambridge describes, women
...recognize the value of the quilting circle, women collectively sharing ideas and strategies, providing support and advice, training and mentoring new members in the group. quilters "knew the determination required by a project so complex; knew and accepted the pain of fingers that quilt; knew how each quilt marks, not time, but our lives--secrets shared or sewn into each piece, events which for Everywoman become a record of her life." There are several such guiding principles which I find are particularly pertinent. One of the most important is to be willing to experiment, to try new colors and patterns, to explore ways of combining weak and strong fabrics in
complementary manners. While experimenting and making decisions, appreciate that a choice which may appear to be a mistake in the early stages of a project may, in the end, be the piece that "makes the quilt." Second, recognize the value of the quilting circle, women collectively sharing ideas and strategies, providing support and advice, training and mentoring new members in the group. This sharing of ideas and mutual support is important at all levels, not just between the most and least experienced. Third, be prepared to work hard, recognizing that completion of a project which challenges and stretches one's abilities requires diligence and dedication. And finally, let us not forget to celebrate. Take time to step back and marvel at our handiwork, to embrace our successes and rejoice in our accomplishments.

Let us celebrate the diversity of women scientists that we are and the opportunities that lie ahead. Happy Quilting!

Back to Top


The Choice Between Child and Career


October 5, 1996

The following excerpts have been taken from a chapter entitled "Barriers to Women in Academic Science and Engineering" by Henry Etzkowitz, Carol Kemelgor, Michael Neuschatz, and Brian Uzzi, which appeared in Willie Pearson Jr. and Irwin Fechter, eds. Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next Generation, 1994. The authors interviewed students and faculty at four university science departments - chemistry, physics, engineering, and computer science - to "determine the receptivity of their cultures to women graduate students and faculty members." Here is what they found:

Pregnancy and Ph.D.'s

It is no surprise that pregnancy and child-bearing still have negative consequences for women in the world of work in the United States (Gerson, 1985). However, the impacts appear to be especially strong in academic science, given its structural features that
mandate virtually exclusive attention to research achievement during the years that coincide with fertility. Realization of what lies ahead sometimes deflects women from pursuing the Ph.D. A woman engineer speaking to a colloquium at a private research university organized to encourage women students to pursue engineering careers She said that she had chosen not to pursue a Ph.D. because she wanted to have her children before she was thirty.
and advised them to seek jobs in industry after the B.A. She said that once they were established, industry would accommodate part-time work or work at home during childbearing and early child-rearing years. She said that she had chosen not to pursue a Ph.D. because she wanted to have her children before she was thirty.

Disparaging Marriage

Marriage and children negatively impact women's careers in academic science at three key
Women, but not men, are sometimes thought to be less than serious about their science if they do not stay single while in graduate school. times: having a child during graduate school, marriage at the point of seeking a job, and pregnancy prior to tenure. In addition, we found some disparagement of marriage during the graduate student career. Women, but not men, are sometimes thought to be less than serious about their science if they do not stay single while in graduate school. As a female graduate student recalled:

When I first interviewed to come here, I was single. On my first day of walking into this department I had an engagement ring on my finger. [My adviser's] attitude was "families and graduate programs don't go together very well." First he was worried I was going to blow my first year planning my wedding. I got a lot of flack about that and so did other women...teasing. "So and so's not going to get much work done this semester because she'll be planning her wedding." [sarcastically] The guys' don't plan weddings.

Earlier in the century, marriage was grounds for a woman's expected retirement from a
faculty position. The mutual exclusion of academic and family life has a long history. Until well into the nineteenth century, Oxbridge male academics were also expected to choose between academic career and marriage. Nevertheless, there have been few, if any, residual carryovers from the male academic celibate role. Even when a choice between academic career and family is no longer an official requirement, the presumption that each role requires a woman's total attention survives. It next surfaces when children are contemplated or arrive. Even when a choice between academic career and family is no longer an official requirement, the presumption that each role requires a woman's total attention survives.

Labor Pains

Women graduate students expect that they will be penalized for having children. One informant visualized her advisor's and the department's reaction: "If I had walked into
Pregnancy is discouraged and graduate women who have children are encouraged to take leaves of absence that tend to become permanent withdrawals. _____'s office and said I was pregnant, they would have been happy for me as a woman, but in their list of priorities as to who to get out of the program and who to support I would have plummeted to the bottom of the list." These concerns arise because the existing academic structure is ill equipped to deal with pregnancy. Pregnancy is discouraged and graduate women who have children are encouraged to take leaves of absence that tend to become permanent withdrawals. In one department an informant
reported that: "The only one left is ______[of the student who has a child]. Two women Ph.D.'s who got pregnant were strongly encouraged to take leaves of absence. One did and one did not come back."

The Future of Women in Science

The reality that years spent in graduate school and especially years spent earning tenure coincide with the years most women prefer to start their families is especially discouraging to women scientists and is a dominant factor dissuading talented women from entering academia, according to this study. However, the authors are optimistic about the future of women in science and suggest:

  1. Encouraging the creation of a critical mass of women faculty in academic science and engineering departments that, in and of itself, has an effect in changing academic cultures and, by implication, lowering barriers for future generations.

  2. Revising the image of high level careers in science and engineering for women from anomalous to "normal" provides the incentive of examples of achievement to encourage younger women to break through the barriers prevalent at early stages of the career.

By highlighting the accomplishments of women scientists at Dartmouth (among others), the Women in Science Project newsletter has the potential to "revise the image . . . [and] to encourage younger women to break through the barriers"; your input will help the cause!

Back to Top


Women's View of the Workplace


June 29, 1997

The following excerpt is from the Winter 1996 issue of US Black Engineer and Information Technology, under the "Survey Examines" section:

Working women aged 18 to 40 maintain high optimism about the workplace of tomorrow, according to a national survey by the Wirthlin Worldwide organization. And they think they themselves are the ones who will make it better.

According to the survey, commissioned by the Sara Lee Corporation to help commemorate the 10th anniversary of its Frontrunner Awards to women achievers, the vast majority, some 93 percent, of respondents believe that women in leadership positions can improve productivity. ...some 93 percent, of respondents believe that women in leadership positions can improve productivity.

Some 83 percent of the 443 women aged 18 to 40 and 14 past Frontrunner winners also said women at the helm would improve the quality of life of their workers.

To get there, the women want a de-emphasis of the corporate desire for workaholics. To get there, the women want a de-emphasis of the corporate desire for workaholics. Seventy-three percent of the respondents thought companies should place less emphasis on hours spent in the office, in recognition of the child-rearing, housekeeping and other family duties which occupy central roles in women's lives, and 60 percent said that gender-sensitivity classes were needed in their workplaces.

Other pressures the women felt affecting their development as corporate career-climbers were:

  • 83 percent feel women are evaluated as much on appearance as on ability;
  • 77 percent believe that being overweight is a barrier to their success;
  • 71 percent say physically attractive women are more likely to succeed;
  • 65 percent say that gender alone can hinder a woman's success;
  • 60 percent feel that having a child takes them off the fast track.

    Back to Top


    Is Female Intuition Inherited?


    June 29, 1997

    The following is a brief summary of a recently published study on a proposed "intuition gene" active on X chromosomes inherited from the father.

    An "Intuition Gene"?

    A team of behavioral geneticists in London maintain that a girl's "ability to interpret
    complex social cues and to be tuned to socially appropriate behavior" is inherited, probably from her father, according to an article in the Thursday, June 12 edition of the Valley News. The scientists believe that an "intuition gene" may exist on the X chromosome, and that when inherited from the mother, the gene is inactive. When passed down from the father, however, the gene may influence social ability. Since boys always receive an X chromosome from their mother, while girls get one of theirs from their father, girls possess an innate sensitivity to social cues, according to the study (Nature, 6/12/97). The scientists believe that an "intuition gene" may exist on the X chromosome, and that when inherited from the mother, the gene is inactive. When passed down from the father, however, the gene may influence social ability.

    The Research

    The researchers evaluated the behavior of girls with Turner's syndrome, an unusual genetic condition in which individuals (always female) have only one sex chromosome,
    They found that girls who inherited the X chromosome from their father scored better on surveys and tests of social cognition than those who inherited it from their mother. the X chromosome. They found that girls who inherited the X chromosome from their father scored better on surveys and tests of social cognition than those who inherited it from their mother. The researchers questioned the parents of 88 girls with Turner's syndrome whether their daughter was, for instance, "lacking in awareness of other's feelings," "unknowingly offends people with [her] behavior," or was "very demanding of people's time." The
    team also administered tests requiring "extensive planning" or "the ability to inhibit certain urges" in order to complete a given task.

    Though far from conclusive, the study suggests that some complex human behavior now attributed to environmental influence may be partially determined by inheritance.

    Back to Top


    Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review


    June 29, 1997

    The following is a brief summary of a study conducted in Sweden that reveals gender discrimination practices in evaluating potential post-docs.

    Identifying the Gender-Bias

    A study by Swedish scientists Christine Wennerås and Agnes Wold published in the May 22 edition of Nature reveals that the Swedish Medical Research Council (MRC) discriminates against women when evaluating candidates for biomedical postdoctoral
    For a woman to be awarded the same competence score as an equally talented man, she must exceed his productivity by 64 impact points... fellowships. The MRC chooses fellowship winners by their scientific competence, the relevance of their research proposal, and the quality of their proposed methodology. Wennerås and Wold found that the MRC consistently underestimates the scientific competence of its female applicants. Thus, a male candidate with a given publication record (a measure of competence) usually scores higher
    in competence than a female candidate with a similar record. For a woman to be awarded the same competence score as an equally talented man, she must exceed his productivity by 64 impact points (one impact point equals one paper published in a lesser-known journal of impact factor 1), the study found. This translates into three extra papers in Nature or Science, or about 20 extra papers in excellent specialist journals.

    From multiple-regression analyses, Wennerås and Wold found that along with productivity, the gender and affiliation of an applicant significantly impacted her competence score, while factors like the applicant's educational background, scientific field, or previous postdoctoral experience did not have significant impacts.

    The Impact

    According to the study, women earn 44% of biomedical Ph.D.'s in Sweden but hold only 25% of the postdoctoral positions and just 7% of professional positions. Since Sweden is
    internationally recognized for providing equal opportunities for its men and women, the authors observe that if there is gender discrimination in the peer-review system in their country, then it likely plays a role in evaluation processes elsewhere. "If gender discrimination of the magnitude we have observed is operative in the peer-review systems of other research councils and grant-awarding organizations, and in countries other than Sweden, this could entirely account for the lower success rate of female as compared with male researchers in attaining high academic rank," the authors state. Since Sweden is internationally recognized for providing equal opportunities for its men and women, the authors observe that if there is gender discrimination in the peer-review system in their country, then it likely plays a role in evaluation processes elsewhere.

    Back to Top


    The Facts Behind the Fiction:
    Erin Morse '02 Invites X-Files Writer
    to Speak on the Science of Star Wars


    by Anne H. Loomis '99                         April 18, 1999

    Erin Morse '02 took a chance and made a connection with author/scientist Jeanne Cavelos, which has enabled her, as well as all of Dartmouth, to meet this woman, whom she admires.

    A Source of Inspiration

    While most people have someone whom they admire ­ perhaps a scientist, a writer or an artist ­ few have the initiative or opportunity to actually meet that person. Not so for Erin Morse '02, a WISP intern and X-Files enthusiast, who will soon meet Jeanne Cavelos, author of The Science of the X-Files, when she visits Dartmouth.

    Morse, who hopes to pursue a career designing, building, or working with space technology, received Cavelos's book from her mother last Christmas. Morse's mother had met Cavelos and told her about the X-Files group Morse and her friends have started here at Dartmouth. Since then, Morse and her friends have been anxious to meet Cavelos, a writer, scientist, and teacher who began her professional life as an astrophysicist and mathematician, and worked for NASA at the Johnson Space Center before embarking upon a career in publishing. ...Morse and her friends have been anxious to meet Cavelos, a writer, scientist, and teacher who began her professional life as an astrophysicist and mathematician, and worked for NASA at the Johnson Space Center before embarking upon a career in publishing.

    "Jeanne Cavelos appeals to us because of her interest in science, her love of the X-Files, and the many things she has accomplished," says Morse. "Her work at NASA's Johnson Space Center is something which I am interested in, as well as one of my friends who wishes to be an astronaut. Another of my friends is a writer and loves science fiction. Cavelos writes in a way which is informative, yet funny and interesting. She sounds like a fun person to meet!"

    Making It Happen

    "We sent her a blitz introducing ourselves and asking if she'd come to Dartmouth and do a book signing, talk, or just meet with us," Morse explains. "...we were psyched to receive her reply, which said that she'd love to meet us!" Morse found Cavelos's webpage (http://www.sff.net/people/jcavelos/) while surfing the net with a friend several months ago, and saw that she frequently holds book signings in the New England area. "We sent her a blitz introducing ourselves and asking if she'd come to Dartmouth and do a book signing, talk, or just meet with us," Morse explains. "At that time, we had nothing set up as far as plansŠit was just a shot in the dark. Needless to say, we were psyched to receive her reply, which said that she'd love to meet us!"

    In order to organize Cavelos's visit, Erin spoke with a few members of the Physics and Engineering departments about how to sponsor the talk. Morse finally connected with Thayer Professor Bill Lotko, organizer of the Thayer School's Jones Seminar on Applied Science and Technology. "Bill Lotko was nice enough to let Cavelos be one of the Jones Seminars," says Morse. "That made our work a whole lot easier, since they organize speakers to come every week."

    Jones Seminars are held every Friday at 3:30 p.m. in 200 Cummings Hall (with refreshments served at 3:15 p.m.). The Thayer School is proud to announce that on April 30th Cavelos will give a lecture entitled "Jumping to Hyperspace and Feeling the Force: The Science of Star Wars." Her talk will address Star Wars questions such as "How close are we to creating robots that look and act like R2-D2 and C-3PO?" and "Can we access a 'force' with our minds to move objects and communicate telepathically with each other?" This lecture is a must-see for all Star Wars enthusiasts, as well as those interested in learning about the fact that exists behind science fiction.

    Says Morse, "Jeanne is making an impact as a woman in science, and I think the Dartmouth community will benefit by her lecture. 'The Science of Star Wars' will be an interesting and fun topic, revealing the links between science fiction and reality. Hopefully her topic will attract more students to the Jones Seminars."

    Take the Initiative

    Because of her initiative, Morse has brought her own interests to the attention of Thayer School faculty in a way that can benefit the Dartmouth community, and she hopes others will follow her lead. Says Morse, "I would definitely encourage other students to invite people who have inspired them! People are always happy to know that they have made an impact on someone in a positive way." Says Morse, "I would definitely encourage other students to invite people who have inspired them! People are always happy to know that they have made an impact on someone in a positive way."

    Back to Top


    Reflection on the Female Flight from Science


    By Kathryn Greer '00 & Erin MacKanin '00                         May 15, 2000

    On Tuesday, May 9, Erin Mackanin and Katie Greer moderated a lunch discussion of the Women in Science Project's study, Looking Back: A Retrospective Study of Dartmouth Science Alumnae 1973-1996. The following article discusses their reasoning behind organizing the event in addition to an overview of the discussion.

    "Why Women Left the Sciences"

    When we read the WISP report, we were immediately drawn to the chapter, "Why Women Left the Sciences." This section stood out--not because it offered new, earth-shattering information but rather validated what both of us suspected. Thirty-three respondents felt that science careers were not people-oriented, and so they Thirty-three respondents felt that science careers were not people-oriented, and so they decided to leave this environment.
    decided to leave this environment. While this is something we have heard many women - and men - mention in discussing problems with their science majors and potential science careers, this finally puts a number with the idea. We also felt that this topic in particular was of interest to students considering careers in the sciences because they will likely face the possibility of one day leaving their science-careers, for any of the reasons mentioned in the report. The more we know about what those before us have faced and decided, the better we become at making similar decisions. After asking the WISP office about spreading this information to other students the idea of a luncheon discussion took shape.

    Some Student Input

    After a brief overview of the main points of the chapter, Erin and I opened the floor up to discussion of three scenarios. The first focused on balancing work and family. The second scenario addressed the importance of peer advising--both formally and informally. And finally, the third focused on a woman who decided to change careers to a more people-oriented field.

    The discussion offered fascinating insight on all three scenarios as well as additional comments on the sciences at Dartmouth. Specifically, students discussed solutions to the
    One of the major points of discussion was that students have no one to go to with suggestions and complaints about their classes. problems associated with the Dartmouth advising system. Additionally, they suggested ways to make classes - especially introductory classes - more attractive and effective for students. One of the major points of discussion was that students have no one to go to with suggestions and complaints about their classes.
    Individual departments seem slow or unwilling to act, people are unsure if their voice matters. Unfortunately, the situation seems to be worsening.

    A Different Perspective

    Despite the frustration that many of the students expressed, we were lucky to have Melinda Burn, the Senior Marketing Development Specialist for DuPont Nylon Intermediates as a guest. Burn was able to give the discussion a different perspective on the work world, commenting on the variety of environments in which one can work in the sciences.

    The discussion was a definite success, and if there is interest, we could potentially hold another to discuss more specific topics. This is an important issue to many women on campus and off. We look forward to further discussion and, of course, to the results of such discussions in the future.

    Back to Top


    Stress & Society: Who's to Blame?


    By: Surabhi Gaur '03                         April 16, 2001

    We are all too familiar with stress. In the following, Surabhi examines stress, its origins, and its impact at Dartmouth and beyond.

    Stress and Culture

    Green tea. Warm baths. Aromatherapy candles.

    We are bombarded everyday with de-stressing techniques. How can we avoid it when television shows like Oprah and The View devote entire weeks of programming to relaxation, Home Shopping Network consistently has a buy one get one free special on Chinese stress balls, and YM Magazine always has those quizzes which ask "Are You Too Stressed Out?" (don't laugh, in your weakest moments while in a doctor's waiting room, you've taken those tests).

    Stress, an intrinsic part of our culture, affects both adults and youth populations. In fact, one study showed that one in three children suffers from chronic stress. Strong scientific evidence and compelling social commentaries Stress, an intrinsic part of our culture, affects both adults and youth populations.
    compel us to believe it is an ailment of our culture. If this is true, then we must question if culture influences stress or if stress influences culture. The relationship is parasitic but its dubious direction prompted interesting findings.

    Are Women More Stressed?

    I came across an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education detailing the 34th annual
    The verdict: women (39 percent) were nearly twice as likely as men (20 percent) to claim that they felt "overwhelmed by all I have to do." survey of college freshmen conducted by the Higher Education Research Institute at the University of California at Los Angeles. The verdict: women (39 percent) were nearly twice as likely as men (20 percent) to claim that they felt "overwhelmed by all I have to do." You women in science must relate to this feeling of being overwhelmed. You're familiar with the drill of a lab report, an exam and a
    part-time job you must attend this week because last week you cancelled because you had an exam the same day.

    Why women more than men? We all know of the pressures of college, especially in the sciences. Reisberg's article points to jobs as a possible answer. He reports, "More women than men (44 percent to 33 percent) found it very likely that they would need to work to pay for college." If the economical reasons are not compelling enough, the article repeats psychological and social differences between men and women which sound familiar: "Women also spent more time studying, volunteering, participating in student activities, and tending to housework or childcare responsibilities. Men reported spending more time exercising and playing sports, watching television, partying, and playing video games." You might be envisioning SportsCenter and Final Fantasy but there is no strong evidence in favor of the idea that men actually are under less pressure than women. We must consider that men are traditionally stoic and therefore less likely to respond "yes" when asked if they feel overwhelmed. Remember, we live in a culture where women are not scorned for crying--unlike men--and thereby have less shame in declaring that they feel overwhelmed.

    No End in Sight

    So college aged-women feel the bite of stress, but do they ever outgrow it? With growing opportunities in the job market--especially in higher paying and higher demanding fields--coupled with the usual household duties, there is no quick relief from stress in sight for women. With these new opportunities, women are now characterized by a set of values not seen very frequently in previous generations. As author Pamela Lister states, "A strong work ethic, a highly developed sense of moral responsibility and civic duty, and an average drive for financial and career success can make it seem normal and right to fill your day with productivity, contribution, efficiency, leadership, and charity."

    You're Gonna Make It On Your Own

    It is also important to do things for your own approval. And sometimes, doing things alone is best. It is also important to do things for your own approval. And sometimes, doing things alone is best. An experiment was conducted at Ohio State University where forty college women were instructed to prepare a speech in two minutes. Twenty had a friend on hand for support and the
    other twenty did not. Interestingly enough, "women with a friend present experienced a surge of cholesterol three times greater than did women with no social support." The psychology professor in charge of the study, Catherine Stoney explained, " 'It's the notion of being evaluated by those whose approval you want.' " While support is good in situations where you have less control, it is normal to want to go at performance-based tasks alone. Sometimes the hardest person to impress is yourself and the addition of someone whose opinion you value is just an added stressor.

    That Ivy Stress

    Dartmouth's Ivy League distinction lends its atmosphere to be competitive and stressful;
    students--especially in the sciences, find themselves pushing back the line when it comes to relaxation time. How many times have you thought, "I cannot work past 1:00 am. Nope, that's my limit. It doesn't matter if it doesn't get done, this is ridiculous, I only sleep four hours a night." Well, you're the same person I see in the bathroom the next day, throwing cold water on your face groping for your bottle of concealer because you again got four hours of sleep--or was it three? I know you had a problem set on top of that lab write-up due today, admit it. It's okay, though, it's already Thursday, tomorrow is Friday, Dartmouth's Ivy League distinction lends its atmosphere to be competitive and stressful; students--especially in the sciences, find themselves pushing back the line when it comes to relaxation time.
    and you can sleep all afternoon if you like. Sure you have a test on Monday, but you'll cross that bridge when you get to it, namely Sunday night.

    The cycle perpetuates. Is it never ending? No, you and I know it lets up every ten weeks, eight and a half in the wintertime. Our cozy hamlet of Hanover is not the only college environment subject to such stress. Beth Greenberg of Harvard Medical School says, "I work with students at Harvard University who tell me that they feel guilty when they're
    We're not as stressed as college students were a generation ago, but there are more opportunities to vie for so we have to force ourselves to be better than the best--at least that is what we tell ourselves as we pull one all-nighter after another, in hopes of beating the all mighty median score on our midterm exams. socializing because they feel like they should be working--they don't know how to ease up." Granted Harvard is not Dartmouth but there is no doubt that pressure rears its ugly head here as well. Regretfully, there seems to be no answer as to when and where to draw the work-relaxation line. Have students of our caliber stopped thinking independently? Are we simply drones who are so consumed by competition and driven by envy and fall victim to the contagion of anxiety that we press ourselves as much as the next guy, and the next guy and the next guy? Or is there simply no problem with our stress levels and is it okay to go for broke every chance we get? We're not as stressed as college students were a generation ago, but there are more opportunities to vie for so we have to force ourselves to be better than the
    best--at least that is what we tell ourselves as we pull one all-nighter after another, in hopes of beating the all mighty median score on our midterm exams.

    The Need for a New Perspective

    Perhaps we are not entirely correct in portraying stress as a societal ill. As a society, we may have raised our standards and lost sight of true stress. In times of economic prosperity perhaps we have become spoiled. The middle class has risen and now, getting
    and keeping a job is not the concern; rather, putting one more car in the garage or affording the cost of another year's tennis lessons for daughter and a new pair of cleats for son are issues. Francine Prose sums it up best by saying, "True stress--the worry we endure over family members who depend on us, the times we need to make a paycheck stretch, the life-altering decisions we are forced As a society, we may have raised our standards and lost sight of true stress. In times of economic prosperity perhaps we have become spoiled.
    to make to ensure our well-being--is not glamorous. Real stress is not a status symbol." Social suicide is actually much less dire a situation than it used to be. We confuse striving for better with do-or-die for better. Again, the line is blurry but bringing it into focus would bring our stressful lives into perspective--a perspective that we as a college community, generation, and nation truly need.

    1McCarthy, Laura. "Raising a stress-free child" in Parenting, Mar 2001, P. 66.
    2 Reisberg, Leo. "Student Stress is Rising, Especially Among Women" in Chronicle of Higher Education, Jan 28, 2000, p. A49.
    3 Ibid
    4 Ibid
    5 Ibid
    6 Lister, Pamela. "Are You Afraid to Slow Down?" in Redbook, Mar 2001, p. 78.
    7 Gorrell, Carin. "Along Against the World" in Psychology Today, Mar/Apr 2001, p. 16.
    8 Ibid
    9 Ibid
    10 McCarthy, Laura. "Raising a stress-free child" in Parenting, Mar 2001, P. 66.
    11 Prose, Francine. "Has stress become a status symbol?" in McCall's, Mar 2001, p. 76.

    Back to Top


    Restructuring the Scientific Workforce & Easing the Academic Tension:
    How to Produce Teamwork Scientists


    By Surabhi Gaur '03                         August 6, 2001

    The social aspect of science needs some fine-tuning, for the sake of science and scientists. This article examines possible changes in graduate programs and how fostering a team environment from the beginning can lead to the entire field altering the isolationist approach.

    A Need for Cooperation

    Lawyers have fundraising galas, businessmen seal deals over martinis. What is the extent of personal interaction among scientists, especially in academia?

    Gradually, science is losing the mascot of the isolated lab worker--which is good since the leaps by which science continues to grow do not encourage such an image. The world is
    growing smaller and information travels faster than ever before. There is no one Newton making discovery after discovery or proposing theory after theory. Every corner of the world potentially houses a scientist of use to another scientist now. Therefore, scientific disciplines now require teamwork and a strong sense of community. To bring this mentality into large government and industrial laboratories, it must grow from the time we train scientists in graduate school. The current structure of many academic science departments leaves help to be desired for AsTherefore, scientific disciplines now require teamwork and a strong sense of community. To bring this mentality into large government and industrial laboratories, it must grow from the time we train scientists in graduate school.
    the many research projects in progress. Such tension does not always create helping and comfortable environments for graduate students.

    I came across an article in a recent issue of Science detailing some changes that can be made to graduate programs. The following excerpt caught my attention:

    "The model of the independent investigator needs to be supplemented with other models of a successful career in science, and these should reflect the complex, team-oriented structure of contemporary research."

    Students now interested in science should be aware that there will be a welcome place for a diverse set of personalities and skills in the scientific realm. Scientific knowledge is now applied to a variety of fields, fields in which an independent investigator is not the best suit to don. New scientists can learn this based upon the environment of their own labs during graduate school.

    A Need for Mentors

    Recently, students and faculty alike are addressing the problems of graduate study programs in the sciences. In March of this year, leaders of research organizations and
    Among the guidelines proposed, speakers highly recommended strengthening the use of mentors. As a WISP reader, such a recommendation should be no surprise. postdoctorate fellows met in Washington, D.C., to devise alterations to the treatment of postdocs and the management of such programs. Among the guidelines proposed, speakers highly recommended strengthening the use of mentors. As a WISP reader, such a recommendation should be no surprise. WISP encourages constructing student-mentor relationships, even at the undergraduate level. This is reflected through MentorNet,
    the Job Shadow program and even in the selection of sponsors for the first year internships. Even if a student has a natural knack for science, there is no doubt that science can be as difficult and frustrating as it is enjoyable and rewarding. Having a mentor provides support and guidance during the challenging times, even when those challenging times crop up in graduate school.

    The Importance of Environment

    Another study done earlier this year explored why the median age for time spent in graduate school had increased from 6.6 years in 1983 to 7.1 in 1993. The most common
    factors related to this phenomenon are a lack of training for conducting independent research, lack of orientation in preparing for comprehensive examination, style of advising while writing the dissertation, attitude towards students, student participation in departmental academic and social activities and peer support. The report went on in further detail to explain, "In relation to departmental climate, research has indicated that the kind of environment (cooperative or contentious) in departments determines, in part, the rate of completion..." "In relation to departmental climate, research has indicated that the kind of environment (cooperative or contentious) in departments determines, in part, the rate of completion..."

    Coming Up With Solutions

    To ameliorate these problems, there is a growing initiative to restructure the professional hierarchy in academic science departments. Universities could create the position of "staff
    Staff scientists could be those extra hands at the bench and allow graduate students to explore their own intellectual curiosity, satisfying the purpose of attending graduate school in the first place. scientists" which would give talented individuals a more definite career path and retain them in academia longer. The stability this adds to the system may reduce the pressure on graduate students. As of now, graduate students are expected to lend hands at the lab bench in addition to being teaching assistants and conducting their own research. Staff scientists could be those extra hands at the bench and allow graduate students to explore their own intellectual curiosity, satisfying the purpose of
    attending graduate school in the first place. With adequate help and more time on everyone's hands, the graduate school process can be more rewarding for the student and for science: new, well-guided scientists will enter the workforce with a teamwork mentality.

    Apparently, there are strong positive effects by offering a more dedicated mentoring unit to graduate students and creating a warm departmental atmosphere. Moreover, the shift from the individual to the group can have a positive effect on women in science. For a long time, women's alleged "softness" has been perceived as a drawback, not just in science, but in many career fields. This "softness" was confused with compassion and refined interpersonal skills. However, now, this is exactly was science needs. Science is looking for people with a sense of sacrifice, community, helping, listening and still learning--women can fill those prerequisites!

    Toward the Future

    Graduate school is still an excellent route to consider. The system needs tweaking, but
    American graduate schools still offer a wealth of opportunity. The study of science remains important because it continues to influence all facets of life. Science is no longer extremely esoteric. Therefore, approaches different from the independent investigator are in demand. To foster a greater spirit of teamwork, science must To foster a greater spirit of teamwork, science must restructure higher learning programs to reflect the value of community.
    restructure higher learning programs to reflect the value of community. Philosophically, if science is meant to better life for all types of people, then it is only sensible that all types of people work together in the field of science.

    Back to Top


    MICRO-MANIA


    By Chris Wilson                         January 21, 2002

    Smaller is Better!

    The New Age of the Machine is upon us. We are embarking on an intriguing journey into the realm of the small. According to the October issue of Physics Today, it is possible to "fabricate inexpensive micromachines that range in size from 0.1 to 100 microns, require little power and operate at high speed." How small is small? Smaller than the diameter of a single strand of hair. Smaller than the naked eye can see. "Imagine a machine so small that it is imperceptible to the human eye. Imagine working machines with gears no bigger than a grain of pollen. ...Imagine a realm where the world is upside down, and the seemingly impossible suddenly becomes easy - a place where gravity and inertia are no longer important, but the effects of atomic forces and surface science dominate. Welcome to the microdomain..."

    How Micromachines are Made

    Micromachines are fabricated using similar technologies developed for the semiconductor industry that were used to construct integrated circuits in computers. In the most common technique, a base layer, typically a silicon wafer, is covered with a thin layer of silicon dioxide. A chemical substance called a polymer is layered on top of the silicon dioxide. The polymer is sensitive to ultraviolet light. On a glass plate, a pattern is made with a metal, like chromium. The pattern is placed on top of the polymer layer, and the whole assembly is exposed to ultraviolet light. The ultraviolet light breaks down the polymer where it is exposed, leaving an image of the pattern that was beneath the chromium. Since the ultraviolet light has not damaged the silicon dioxide, a chemical is needed to remove the exposed parts of the silicon dioxide in the pattern. Then the polymer layer is removed and - voila! - a micromachine is born. "Imagine a machine so small that it is imperceptible to the human eye. Imagine working machines with gears no bigger than a grain of pollen. ...Imagine a realm where the world is upside down, and the seemingly impossible suddenly becomes easy - a place where gravity and inertia are no longer important, but the effects of atomic forces and surface science dominate. Welcome to the microdomain..."

    From Sandia National Laboratories http://mems.sandia.gov/scripts/index.asp

    Micro-machines Can Do it All!

    What do micromachines do? They operate the airbag in your car. They are temperature sensors for mechanical systems in buildings, even tiny fans. They are parts in your cell phone that allow it to be so light and small. And recently, they are even in your shoes.

    According to a January 2, 2002 article on the smalltime - big news in small tech webpage (smalltimes.com) Joseph Paradiso and his students at MIT have completed their 4-year project of what they termed a "potpourri" of micromachines. They placed 16 sensors in a black Caprezio Dansneaker to measure tilt, speed, and acceleration, and pressure at the toe, ball and heel. The shoe also has a circuit board attached to the ankle to measure speed, radial motion, height off the floor and position in the room. It sends all this data from a tiny antenna to a computer that then turns the movements into music - music, from dance movements! Right now it is more like an expensive toy, but the hope is that eventually this type of device can be used in rehabilitation centers to determine how patients learn to walk after an accident.

    Thayer's Micro-Machines

    Thayer School of Engineering has its own micromachine fabrication facility. There is the Microfabrication lab that is utilized in several engineering courses and used for summer workshops. Professors from fields such as physics and computer science collaborate with the Engineering Department on various micromachines. Over the past few years, Dr. Chris Levey, the Director of the Microengineering Cleanroom Facility, has advised a number of WISP Interns on micromachine projects. The interns have fabricated tiny gears, cantilevered beams and even a programmable odor generator smaller than a pocket calculator. Imagine watching your favorite movie, with your Dolby surround sound system, and smelling the bread they are baking, or the newly mowed grass, or even the stench of a crowded subway train. Each seat in a theater could be equipped with these tiny programmable odor generators.

    The possibilities truly do seem limitless.

    Back to Top


    Fire in the Sky


    By Chris Wilson                         November 12, 2001

    "A fast-moving coronal mass ejection that billowed away from the Sun on Nov. 4th swept past our planet at 8:50 p.m. EST on Nov 5th. The impact triggered a severe geomagnetic storm and widespread auroras (northern lights) reaching as far south as Florida, Texas, and California in the United States. Stay tuned to SpaceWeather.com for details and updates."

    Space weather has made big headlines in the news recently. The Valley News had a color photo of the aurora on the front page of last Wednesday's paper, and the Rutland Daily Herald had a large article on the havoc the sightings caused people all over the country who didn't know what that light in the sky was all about. Space weather and the storms that occur can have drastic affects on all of us. On March 13th, 1989 a huge magnetic storm - the second largest storm experienced in the past 50 years- totally shut down Hydro-Quebec, the power grid servicing Canada's Quebec province. The geomagnetic storm tripped five electrical transmission lines from James Bay causing enormous power generation loss. Line restoration was complete by noon, but thousands of customers were still without power, as the system was trying to cope with the extra demand of Monday morning at the office, and customers trying to recover from over nine hours of heat loss to their homes. At the same time, beautiful auroras (northern lights) were visible as far south as southern France, all caused by the same storm.

    For those of us living on Earth, space weather is essentially the interactions between the Sun and the Earth. The sun may seem really far away, but what's happening on the sun's surface, and the 'stuff' that the sun emits, hits the Earth (and all the other planets) and can directly impact our Earth environment. Ninety-five percent of the sun's energy reaches us in the form of light and heat, while the remaining 5% accounts for space weather phenomena. Auroras are beautiful displays of the Earth's magnetic field being bombarded with particles from the solar wind on an average day in space weather. The Hydro-Quebec scenario was one of those stormy days, where essentially one of the Sun's 'burps' hit the Earth's magnetic field and created geomagnetic induced currents, or GICs, that destroyed the transformer. The apparent void between Sun and Earth is actually a maelstrom of wind and storm, with interludes of calm, always bathed in the harsh glow of ultraviolet and x-ray light. So strong is the outpouring solar wind that Earth's magnetic envelope is distorted, quivering even as it protects the fragile life on our planet.

    What's a magnetic field? A magnetic field itself is the result of moving electric charges that travel along field lines from pole to pole. Remember playing with magnets? A compass points to the magnetic north pole. The Earth's magnetic field travels from South Pole to North Pole. It acts as a shield, protecting the Earth from dangerous electrically charged particles that can't penetrate the field, but are forced to move past it and around Earth, off into space.

    The solar wind is one million tons of electrically charged particles (protons and electrons) that are spewed from the sun's surface out into space every second. The Sun's 'burps', called coronal mass ejections, are huge bubbles of gas that travel at millions of miles per hour, expanding into space and crashing into the solar wind, causing shock waves that accelerate protons to dangerously high energies just before they hit the Earth's magnetic field. These are the storms that can have devastating effects on satellites, power lines, radio transmissions, navigational equipment, as well as on astronauts and even airline passengers who might be exposed to more intense radiation.


    These aurora bands over Quartz Lake State Park, Alaska was taken on 6 September, 1996 by Jan Curtis. http://climate.gi.alaska.edu/Curtis/curtis.html
    How do you study and predict space weather? Is it happening on campus?

    "Space weather is in its infancy," Simon Shepherd, a Visiting Research Professor in the Thayer School of Engineering, told me. "Space weather is at the same point meteorology was maybe twenty years ago, trying to come up with models that will enable us to predict patterns."

    Simon is just one of about a dozen people on campus in Physics and in Engineering that are studying various aspects of space weather. Simon is a member of a research project called Super Dual Aurora Radar Network (SuperDARN), which is a series of radar

    stations scattered across the polar regions of the Earth. These stations measure the circulation of charged particles in the ionosphere much in the same manner that weather forecasters use Doppler radar to forecast weather. "They are big HAM radios," says Simon.

    "This kind of project is the ultimate combination of physics and engineering," says Simon. Physics provides the scientific backdrop, while it takes significant engineering to design and implement the physical equipment necessary to carry out the research. These radar towers are 60 feet tall. Then there are the electronics that operate the equipment and collect the data; there are the harsh 'living conditions' of these instruments that are placed in the dark, cold polar regions, where winds are off the charts and ice is a major source of damage. And then there's the data analysis, and ultimately, the computer modeling that follows.

    Simon is offering '05's or '04's the opportunity to work on the SuperDARN research project as a WISP intern. The project will give students a chance to ask questions and direct where their research might be headed based on their own interests. There is so much to learn about space weather! Come to the WISP office for more information.

    Back to Top

    Back to 'WISE Stories' Table of Contents