Skip to main content

You may be using a Web browser that does not support standards for accessibility and user interaction. Find out why you should upgrade your browser for a better experience of this and other standards-based sites...

Dartmouth Home Search Index

Dartmouth Home | Search | Index

Dartmouth home page
Tucker Foundation
Sermons Religious & Spiritual LifeHome Religious & Spiritual Life > Sermons >

Singing the Songs of David and Solomon

Rollins Chapel
Dartmouth College
November 1st, 2007
Timothy Baker '08

Some of the most famous and important heroes of the Bible are those whom we might call covenantal heroes: the men who, due to an uncanny relationship with God, were given the opportunity to unite with God in mutual promise. Covenanting with someone, making a promise with someone, is a sublime and holy act wherein you give a portion of yourself to the Other. Covenant, from the Latin “convenire” literally means “to come together.” A covenant, therefore, if it is a true covenant, binds two individuals in common accord and provides the opportunity for an eternal investment since the portion of yourself you freely give away lives on, immortally, in the Other.

Abraham and David covenanted with God, as one to an Other, and their promise lives on through Jesus in the New Testament. Notice, for instance, the way the author of Matthew, the Gospel’s great exegete, opens his book: “An account of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham, (Matthew 1:1).” Jesus, David, Abraham. Abraham covenanted for eternity, David for endless rule, and Jesus, as the Christian Messiah must, for our author, represent both of those things. Yet there is more to the story. “Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” We have heard, in our reading from Psalm 89 that David, according to the prophet, is the firstborn son of God. We must also remember, thinking back to the covenantal scene in Genesis 17, that God, at the moment of the covenant, changes Abram’s name to Abraham: an act of the father, whose action of naming signifies acceptance of the child as his own.

But why a son? Why in these personal acts of covenanting does God accept the role of Father so as to come together with a son? The love between father and son, parent and child, is distinct from any other form of love that might be. The child exemplifies the act of the covenant par excellence in two distinct ways. First, the child is the natural and glorious outcome of the covenant as Genesis teaches us in the verse: “Therefore a man leaves his father and his mother and clings to his wife, and they become one flesh, (Genesis 2:24).” Second, the parent invests in the child and therefore becomes immortal. The child is a promise to his or her parents, embodying the hopes and aspirations of both the mother and the father and carrying their love, as a living symbol of their covenant, into the future. To call God the “Father” and to designate those to whom he covenants with as “son” is to suggest that God has truly “come together” with the child and invested his hopes, his aspirations, and his divinity within his charge. A promise, literally a “sending forth,” is the vector of eternal potential that comes from the act of covenant.

That being said, you are probably wondering how this relates to the topic of “wisdom,” as wisdom is the focus of our meditations here today. Allow me now to turn to Solomon, the son of David and Bathsheba. After all, Solomon is called the wisest of all men, so he has to be relevant! Solomon, the wise king, ruled, as it were, wisely in various different ways. For instance, his first act of king, as recorded in the Deuteronomistic history, is to ally himself with the powerful country of Egypt by marrying pharaoh’s daughter. Moreover, the Queen of Sheba is so impressed by the wisdom and magnificence of King Solomon that she makes grand presents to him, and he, in return, “gave her everything that she wanted and asked for, (1 Kings 10:13).” “King Solomon excelled all the kings on earth in wealth and in wisdom, (1 Kings 10:23).” In addition, to defend the city of Jerusalem he “assembled chariots and horses, (1 Kings 10:25)” creating a substantial cavalry. Also, we must not forget the building projects which marked Solomon’s reign and the infrastructure improvements he was able to accomplish due to his wisdom and his power. All in all it would seem that God’s promise made to David for eternal kingship was well played by David’s son Solomon. Well, except for one small detail. Allow me to read to you something from Deuteronomy:

When you have come into the land that the Lord your God is giving you, and have taken possession of it and settled in it, and you say, “I will set a king over me, like all the nations that are around me,” you may indeed set over you a king whom the Lord your God will choose. One of your own community you may set as king over you; you are not permitted to put a foreigner over you, who is not of your own community. Even so, he must not acquire many horses for himself, or return the people to Egypt in order to acquire more horses, since the Lord has said to you, “You must never return that way again.” And he must not acquire many wives for himself, or else his heart will turn away; also silver and gold he must not acquire in great quantity for himself.

Solomon, it would seem, has sacrificed his moral duties, the ‘Torah of the King,’ in order to be politically wise and humanly successful. While I am not suggesting, and I see no reason to argue that the Bible is suggesting, that wisdom and Godliness are incompatible, I am asserting that Solomon is wise but not moral in the Biblical sense: the two are distinct.

In light of our knowledge of Abraham, David, and Jesus, listen to the poignancy of God’s chastisement of Solomon in 1 Kings 11 (v.9, 11-12):

Then the Lord was angry with Solomon, because his heart had turned away from the Lord… Therefore the Lord said to Solomon, “Since this has been your mind and you have not kept my covenant and my statutes that I have commanded you, I will surely tear the kingdom from you and give it to your servant. Yet for the sake of your father David I will not do it in your lifetime; I will tear it out of the hand of your son.

God tells our wise old king that his wisdom is ultimately meaningless when it comes to his relationship to God. Sure, wisdom carried Solomon well through most of his mortal life and in his duties as a king. Yes, wisdom brought him fame and fortune because he always knew just what to say and how to act. Yet, wisdom alone means nothing to God. God is angry with Solomon because he failed to relate to God the way David, his father did. In the relationship between God and David, David was both the pursuer and the pursued by God. That is the nature of covenant: two come together because both want to, and therefore need to, unite as one. David, though certainly not perfect, was beloved by God because his heart was turned towards God and, as such, God was able to invest in David.

Solomon turned his heart from God by neglecting the Davidic covenant – a covenant passed down to Solomon within David’s investment in Solomon as son and heir – and by breaking the laws for living that God had commanded. God, in turn, speaks harrowing words: “Yet for the sake of your father David I will not do it in your lifetime; I will tear it out of the hand of your son, (1 Kings 11:12).” David’s covenant with God protects Solomon because God’s love for his son David holds back the extent of his fury. Reading through 1 Kings I think you will find that in all instances in which God appears to Solomon he appears to “the son of David.” There is no Solomon to God because Solomon never covenants with God allowing God to accept Solomon as son by the power of the name. Since Solomon breaks the promise of God and the promise of his father David, God’s punishment is to tear the kingdom from Solomon’s own son. Imagine, for a moment, the implications of this. Solomon’s son, like all sons of the father, holds the eternal promise of the parent. God, in this final decree to Solomon, tells him that his love of wisdom instead of the love of God will ultimately annihilate him: Solomon, in murdering the gift of his father, condemns his own child.

What then, might the love song of David and the requiem of Solomon mean to us, in our lives, as we strive for wisdom and for love? Solomon’s fatal flaw was not that he was wise, it was that his wisdom blinded him to the importance of a relationship with God. God, in the first vision of Solomon, initiates the pursuit for the sake of His son David but Solomon, having received the gift from God refused to return pursuit. We must be conscious of the fact, from what we learn in Scripture, that the gift of God is a bequest meant to be given as well as received. To bequeath is to enter into covenant, to give part of your self to an Other and to attain immortality through the mutual act. I think that we might better understand our Christian faith in this light. Jesus, as the Son of God, makes God accessible to us through proxy. To enter into a relationship with the Son is to enter into a relationship with the Father. The relationship however, is not one of wisdom, or even one of worship: it is of covenanting, coming together as one so that God may invest in us his promise for eternity as a child of the father. That is the love of God, far surpassing any wisdom. That is his bequest.

Last Updated: 11/30/07