|
Dinner with the Dean
by Sam Stein 04
This article is reprinted with the permission of The Dartmouth
During the past several years there have been myriad constants at Dartmouth.
For instance: DOC Trips will determine your first-year friendships, addiction
to frozen yogurt seems inevitable among the female gender and complaints
will be made by various op-ed writers for the D. Two years ago, a new
tradition started with Tuesday night dinners being held at the Dean of
the Tucker Foundation, Stuart Lord's house. It's been this way, every
week, for the last two years, and I hope it will continue for a long time
to come.
I found myself sitting in the dining room of the Lord Estate thinking
about how I was in a truly unique and fantastic a situation. Conversation
quickly began among the nine other students who would be joining the dean
for dinner. For a moment I felt like a vintage bourgeois Ivy League student,
a kid hanging out at a "hahvahd" bar, an eager intellect waiting
to demonstrate my knowledge most vociferously. This lasted for a brief
moment.
As the group quieted before dinner, Dean Lord, sitting at the head of
the table asked us to introduce ourselves. After the introductions were
through, the education began. Dean Lord, in a very systematic and subtle
manner, transformed a group of 10 students into a miniature, " think-tank."
Within several minutes, we experienced a refreshing change from our normal
academic driven lives.
To understand this, we must take a look at the history of these "Tucker
dialogues." Tucker dialogues were designed to give students the opportunity
to share good food and stimulating discussion with the dean of the Tucker
Foundation. The conversations are centered around general social/campus
concerns, with the focus being on racial and/or ethnic issues specifically
at Dartmouth. Over the course of two years, more than 600 students have
had dinner on Tuesday nights with Dean Lord. The Dean's house has come
to symbolize the epitome of faculty-student relationships -- where no
topic is taboo, no issue too insignificant to broach. The focus of conversation
during our dinner was how to rid Dartmouth of its exclusivity. More specifically,
what reforms could be made to help erase social boundaries that seem to
occur between students of different races and ethnicities?
It was during the discussion of such reforms that I came to the realization
that what I was doing at Dean Lord's household was both the paradox and
the ultimate goal of my time at Dartmouth. During my two years at Dartmouth,
I have studied literature, explored history, solved theorems, written
research papers and even learned tribal dances. Rarely, though, have I
ever attempted to put my knowledge to practical use. Sure I have volunteered
my time, done good deeds, even helped a friend with homework once, but
hardly ever have I put my expertise into practice. My studies have been
more about accumulation and less about implementation.
Deans Lord's guidance and dialogue enabled the 10 of us to converse for
about 15 minutes on the subject of racial identity and exclusivity at
Dartmouth. The basic facts that were brought up were that students intentionally
segregate themselves in social settings and that fraternities and athletic
teams play an essential role in this. After those 15 minutes, but without
a noticeable interruption in the conversation, our group of 10 had begun
brainstorming solutions to the problem. Finally, we came across the most
basic of solutions. Two tables in Food Court would be set aside so that
students who wanted to meet new students could have this opportunity.
There would be no rules, regulations or stipulations of any kind. Which
meant no diversity campaign advertised all over the campus. Just two tables,
marked by green tablecloths, meant for people to sit down to eat with
and meet others. There were concerns about the financial burden that such
a reform might place on the College, but we all agreed that it should
be done. Sitting around the elongated dining room table, the 10 of us
had put our minds together and stumbled upon something so basic, pure
and simple, it seemed absurd that it had never been done before.
The experience at Dean Lord's house demonstrated that there are greater
things to do at this College than memorizing information. In fact, it
exemplified that we can use what we know for a more constructive purpose.
I finally concluded that if our reform fails
well there's always
next Tuesday at the dean's house.
|