Climate Change Positions of the Democratic Candidates


Provided by the students of Sustainable Dartmouth; we do not endorse any candidate.


Information compiled from candidate websites, public statements, www.heatison.org, and www.grist.org

Coal

Biden Opposes investment in liquid coal
Clinton Supports investing in liquid coal if it reduces carbon pollution by 20%
Dodd New coal plants must capture and store carbon emissions
Edwards Ban new coal plants unless they capture and store carbon emissions
Gravel New coal plants must capture and store carbon emissions
Kucinich Phase out all coal power and mining
Obama supported legislation for coal liquefaction, but later qualified this by saying he only supports it if it emits 20% less CO2 over its lifetime than conventional fuels
Richardson Opposes liquid coal. Supports ban on new coal plants unless they capture and store emissions; Shift subsidies to renewables

Noteworthy Strategies and Career Highlights

Biden Would start Flip-to-Save program to provide $50 million to states to educate consumers on efficient technologies
Clinton Would start Strategic Energy Fund to research energy independence, financed by taxing oil companies’ windfall profits ($50b over 10 years)
Dodd Proposes corporate carbon tax
Edwards First to make his campaign carbon neutral, Proposes a “GreenCorps” branch of Americorps, Proposes $13b/year New Energy Economy Fund
Gravel Would establish national maglev train system
Kucinich Propsoses a Works Green Adminstration relying to expand solar and wind power
Obama Would provide incentives for US auto companies to gain the competitive edge in efficient vhicles
Richardson Energy secretary under Bill Clinton

Greenhouse Gas Reduction Target

Biden 80% by 2050; Cap & Trade strategy
Clinton 80% by 2050, Cap & Trade strategy
Dodd 80% by 2050, Cap & Trade strategy
Edwards At least 80% by 2050, Cap & Trade strategy
Gravel Wean world from fossil fuels within a decade
Kucinich 80% by 2050, Cap & Trade strategy
Obama 80% by 2050, Cap & Trade strategy
Richardson 90% by 2050, Cap & Trade strategy

Ethanol and Biofuels

Biden Would require that the fuel supply include 10 billion gallons of renewable fuel a year by 2010
Clinton Strategic Energy Fund would work invest R&D in cellulosic ethanol
Dodd Government should support it, particularly cellulosic ethanol
Edwards US should produce 65 billion gallons of ethanol a year by 2025
Gravel Not articulated in campaign material
Kucinich Not articulated in campaign material
Obama Set a low carbon fuel standard and then let market forces drive expansion of corn and cellulosic ethanol
Richardson Support development of technologies for affordable production of cellulosic ethanol (from materials such as switchgrass) to displace petroleum. Research funding of $1 billion/yr for five years.

Nuclear Energy

Biden Would invest heavily in finding a safe storage solution and developing ways to reconfigure spent fuel into reusable fuel
Clinton Agnostic, but will continue research
Dodd An important alternative energy source, but must continue research in disposing of wastes
Edwards Opposes nuclear energy
Gravel Opposes nuclear energy
Kucinich Decommission nuclear plants, regulate waste more strictly
Obama Supports it
Richardson Supports it

Copyright 2006 Dartmouth Green Magazine

Login