Home
Editing the Short Film...
The (Very) Basic Stages of Editing
Rewriting in the Editing Room
Tips
Exercise
|
|
Editing the Short Film: Rewriting in the Editing Room
It's important to note that each of the stages outlined above is actually a step
in a rewriting process. Editing a film is not unlike editing a paper: you make
notes about what ideas you intend to cover; you assemble these notes into a rough
draft; and you re-read the paper, looking for problems that you work tirelessly
to solve. Some of the problems might be huge: your structure doesn't work, or
your logic doesn't stand up to scrutiny. On the other hand, some of your
problems might be minor: you've left out a comma, or you've written a sentence
that is un-emphatic. In any case, as you edit, you work and re-work your text,
problem-solving as you go.
When editing a paper or a film, it's useful to have a sense of what sorts of
problems typically arise, so that you can be on the lookout for them. For
example, if you know that most writers have to work and re-work their thesis
sentences before they get them right, or that paragraph coherence is a common
problem, you'll have an eye out for these problems as you edit your work.
When we edited Because of Mama, we encountered several different problems that
seemed to us to typify the sorts of problems generally encountered in editing.
We list them here, from large to small, so that you can look for them as you edit
your film. We tell you how we solved them in our film:
-
The film's structure doesn't work. This moment is perhaps the most terrifying
of all moments you can have when editing: you look at your rough assembly and you
understand that the structure just isn't working. At first, you'll just have a
gut reaction that something is "off." The film will feel tedious, or slow, or
confusing. You'll have to analyze that feeling, figure out what the problem is,
and then strategize as to how to fix it. In Because of Mama, the problem was
that the concert scene didn't work. If you look at the script, you'll see that
all of the interaction between the boy and his father took place before he
arrived at the concert. As he played, he flashed back on the events with his
father, using those memories to move him to play more feelingly. Our intention
was to repeat key shots from earlier in the film, to invoke the boy's feelings.
But the result was disastrous. All of the film's drama had happened by the time
the boy went on stage. The film lagged, and the repetition of shots was a bore.
Our editor suggested that we try taking the final bit of drama between the boy
and his father and withhold it from the audience, revealing it in flashback form
as the boy performs. Her suggestion required a major restructuring, but it saved
the film.
-
A key scene doesn't work and needs to be fixed in editing. This problem occurs
in almost every film: the scene seemed to be working when it was written and as
it was shot, but when it's placed within the context of the film it's just not
"happening." Often a scene is simply too long, and it's length interrupts the
movie's overall rhythm. If the scene is necessary to the film, you can't simply
drop it; you have to rework it or even rewrite it in editing. For example, our
final scene wasn't working. The scene was well-written, and well-acted, but it
was too long. We were belaboring the points because we weren't confident that
the audience would feel satisfied with our ending. In the end, we cut the scene
in half, removing all but the most essential dialogue moments. We lost some talk
that the writer was fond of, but in the end she agreed: we had a leaner,
stronger scene.
-
A scene slows the film down. Again, this problem is very common. Your film is
moving along, and suddenly it falls flat. Again, the acting might be fine, and
the scene might work on its own, but it doesn't move your film forward. Here you
have to ask yourself: is this scene really necessary? Return to the questions
we list above, in What Makes a Good Scene. Does the scene have a dramatic moment?
Does it move your story forward? Does it reveal anything new? If you find
yourself answering "no" to these questions, you should drop the scene. If you
look at the Because of Mama screenplay, you'll see that there's a scene early in
the film between the boy and an ice cream vendor. The scene has charm, but it
bogged down the film. We cut it. Do you think we lost anything?.
-
The acting isn't working. Sometimes you'll find that the acting just isn't
working. An actor does something that seemed to work in the moment, but is
distracting on film. Maybe a gesture is too big, or too small. Or maybe the
actor is using the wrong eye-line. Generally, these problems are easy to fix:
you can cut around the actor's mistake by dropping the line altogether or by
substituting footage of the other actor's response.
-
A key shot is missing. Here's when a director will kick himself. He needs a
reaction shot and understands that he doesn't have it. If you're a big-time
filmmaker, you can go and get the shot. But if you're making a short film, on
limited time and money, getting the shot is almost always impossible. In our
case, we understood in the editing room that we didn't have a key shot of the boy
reacting to his mother when he's finished performing at his concert. To get that
shot, the director would have had to return to Russia, reassemble the crew, and
re-shoot. Not practical. So we had to cheat: we repeat a shot from earlier in
the film. If your editor is good, few will notice the cheat, and the shot will
work.
-
Some important information isn't conveyed clearly. Sometimes you think that
your film is finished, and that everything works. But you know your film too
well: you know what's happening, and what's going to happen. Accordingly, you
might miss a problem that others will see. That's why it's important to get
other people to view the film while you edit it. Fresh eyes will spot fresh
problems. In our case, many of our viewers were confused in the scene where the
boy's shoes are stolen. We listened to their input, and re-cut the scene for
clarity.
|
 |