|
Russian Art of the Avant-garde |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Among them was Kazimir Malevich, whose 1912 painting, "Taking in the Harvest" is seen here. Like Gauguin in Polynesia, Malevich and his colleagues "went native" in their search for a more pristine artistic expression, paying particular attention to the life and culture of their indigenous people--the Russian and Ukrainian peasant. Of course, peasant life had been idealized earlier in Russian art, but Malevich added to this an industrial quality: painting peasants with cylindrical, robot-like arms, legs, and bodies. At the same time, his lavish use of metallic greens, blues, and bronzes set them apart from the real world of human experience. | |
|
"The Woodcutter" (1912). Malevich integrated the machines
of the modern world with the still-primitive life of the Russian people. |
|
|
|
|
|
In the World of Art movement and the Russian avant-garde, artists worked collaboratively with musicians, dancers, directors, and writers in creating productions that would show off the alchemy of the arts. One such collaborative effort was "Victory Over the Sun" (1913), a cubo-futurist opera with sets and costumes by Malevich, discordant music by Mikhail Matiushin, and a libretto by Velimir Khlebnikov and Aleksei Kruchonykh. People were transformed into "moving machines" by costumes of cardboard and wire. Malevich's drawing for the Enemy for the 1913 production of "Victory Over the Sun." A costume of a worker in Malevich's design for "Victory Over the Sun." Retrospectively, Malevich declared that his backdrop for the second act, fifth scene of "Victory Over the Sun" was the first public display of Suprematism. Certainly, the large square divided diagonally recalls his painting "Black Square." Still it is possible, in the context of the play, to see this design as symbolic of the split between night and day, and therefore as representational rather than purely abstract. The libretto of "Victory Over the Sun" explored new aesthetic
ideas such as zaum: transrational language. Some actors spoke
only with vowels, others only with consonants, while blinding lights
and ear-splitting sounds rocked through the theater in an effort to
give man "victory over the sun"--freedom from all dependence
on the traditional order of the world. |
|
|
Another example of artistic collaboration can be seen in Natalia Goncharova's stage sets for Rimsky-Korsakov's last opera "The Golden Cockerel" based on a tale by Pushkin. (1914).
|
|
|
"Black Square" (1915) by Kazimir Malevich. Over time, Malevich transformed the cylindrical metallic figures of his woodcutters and peasants into shapes: ovals, circles, rhombuses, triangles, rectangles, and squares. "The Square," Malevich wrote "is the face of the new art and the first step of pure creation in art. Now our world of art has become new, non-objective, and pure."He reduced the three-dimensionality of his earlier work to the verge of two, and initiated Suprematism. Malevich discussed Suprematism in a 1916 letter: "Suprematism provides me with the keys to the still imperceived. My new painting does not pertain to the earth alone. The earth has been abandoned like a termite-ridden house. And man really does consciously seek space, he longs to 'break loose from the earth'." The components of the Russian icon left a profound visual effect on the artists of the Russian avant-garde. When Malevich first displayed his "Black Square" (his most radical painting) at the 0.10 exhibition in Petrograd in 1915, he placed it in the "beautiful corner" traditionally reserved for the icon in a Russian Orthodox household.
|
|
|
Similarly, his 1913 painting "Black Cross" it has
been suggested, recalls the cross patterns in the vestments of iconographic
portrayals of St. Nicholas.
|
|
|
"White on White" (1918). Malevich's "white on white" series of 1918 followed his black square on a white ground and shows the extent to which he had developed his ideas on Suprematism.
|
|
| "Monument to the Third International" (1919) by Vladimir Tatlin. Although never built, Tatlin's design for the monument demonstrates Constructivism: art allied with engineering. Tatlin planned a monument that would be built according to completely new architectural principles and from completely new architectural forms. Seen by its creator as a way of uniting purely artistic forms with utilitarian intentions, Tatlin's monument took the form of a soaring, 400 meter high spiral of cast iron that was to straddle the River Neva in the center of Petrograd. To celebrate the dynamism of the revolutionary society that was taking shape in Russia, steel cables were to suspend a cube, a pyramid, and a cylinder within the upturned spiral, each being made of glass and steel and designed to revolve at speeds regulated by whether the agencies they housed met once a day, once a month, or once a year. | |
|
Updated 9/18/2002 |
|