Below is a list of my publications, as well as links that will allow you to download pdfs of the papers. 


22) “Law, Morality, and Everything Else: General Jurisprudence as a Branch of Metanormative Theory”, Ethics. Co-authored with Scott Shapiro. (forthcoming). pdf

21) “Robust Normativity, Morality, and Legal Positivism”, Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence. Eds. Plunkett, Shapiro, and Toh. Oxford Universty Press. (forthcoming).

20) “What Are/Should We Be Doing When We Do Normative Inquiry?”, Conceptual Ethics and Conceptual Engineering. Eds. Burgess, Cappelen, and Plunkett. Oxford Universty Press. Co-authored with Tristram McPherson. (forthcoming).

19) “Negotiating the Meaning of ‘Law’: The Metalinguistic Dimension of the Dispute Over Legal Positivism”, Legal Theory. (forthcoming).

18) “Reasons Internalism”, The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Eds. McPherson and Plunkett. Routledge. Co-authored with Errol Lord. (forthcoming). pdf

17) “The Nature and Explanatory Ambitions of Metaethics”, The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. Eds. McPherson and Plunkett. Routledge. Co-authored with Tristram McPherson. (forthcoming). pdf

16) “Quasi-Expressivism about Statements of Law: A Hartian Theory”, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, Vol. 3. Eds. Gardner, Green, and Leiter. Oxford University Press. Co-authored with Stephen Finlay. (forthcoming). pdf

15) “Justice, Non-Human Animals, and the Methodology of Political Philosophy”, Jurisprudence. (2016). Vol. 7, No. 1, 1-29. pdf / link

14) “Conceptual History, Conceptual Ethics, and The Aims of Inquiry: A Framework for Thinking About The Relevance of the History/Genealogy of Concepts to Normative Inquiry”, Ergo. Vol. 3, No. 2, 27-64 (2016). pdf / link

13) “Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy”, Inquiry. Vol. 58, Nos. 7-8, 828-874. (2015). pdf link

12) “Deliberative Indispensability and Epistemic Justification”, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 10.  Ed. Shafer-Landau. Oxford University Press. 104-133. Co-authored with Tristram McPherson. (2015). pdf

11) “Non-Consequentialism Demystified”, Philosophers’ Imprint. Vol. 15, No. 4, 1-28. Co-authored with Howard Nye and John Ku. (2015). pdf / link

10) “Antipositivist Arguments from Legal Thought and Talk: The Metalinguistic Response”, Pragmatism, Law, and Language. Ed. Hubbs and Lind. Routledge. 56-75. Co-authored with Tim Sundell. (2014). pdf

9) “Dworkin’s Interpretivism and The Pragmatics of Legal Disputes”, Legal Theory. Vol. 19, No. 3, 242-281. Co-authored with Tim Sundell. (2013). pdf / link

8) “Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms”, Philosophers’ Imprint. Vol. 13, No. 23, 1-37. Co-authored with Tim Sundell. (2013). pdf / link

6+7) “Conceptual Ethics” (I and II), Philosophy Compass. Vol. 8, No. 12, 1091-1011 and 1102-1110. Co-authored with Alexis Burgess. (2013).       I: pdf  / link    II: pdf link

5) “Legal Positivism and the Moral Aim Thesis”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 33, No. 3, 563-605. (2013). pdf / link

3+4) “The Planning Theory of Law” (I and II), Philosophy Compass. Vol. 8, No. 2, 149-158 and 159-168. (2013). I: pdf  / link    II: pdf / link

2) “A Positivist Route for Explaining How Facts Make Law”, Legal Theory. Vol. 18, No. 2, 139-207. (2012). pdf / link

1) “Expressivism, Representation, and the Nature of Conceptual Analysis”, Philosophical Studies. Vol. 156, No. 1, 15-31. (2011). pdf / link