A One-Line Program as Book: 10PRINT

10print[This is a guest post by Kathi Inman Berens, who curates electronic literature and researches classroom interfaces. This year, she's co-curating e-lit exhibits at MLA and the first-ever e-lit show at the Library of Congress. She teaches at USC, where she's a Fellow at the Annenberg Innovation Lab. Follow her on Twitter at @kathiiberens.--JBJ]

Lifting up the 10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10 hardcover, one’s first impression is: I’d better use both hands. It’s a heavy art book compressed to the physical dimensions of a typical academic monograph, though it is anything but typical.

Designed by Casey Reas (one of 10PRINT‘s ten co-authors, many of whom have been collaborating recombinantly for years), this glorious hardback is not just a container, a div for prose, but a beautifully realized art object. Check out these images on Reas’ 10PRINT Flickr stream. Even the book’s paper edges seem aestheticized, marbled by cerulean ink meandering from the book’s seventy-plus monochromatic illustrations and chapter breaks.

10Print x 2

Tactile and visually rich, the 10PRINT aesthetic experience is compromised for readers of the free PDF. Book pages displaying four mazes (116-17, for example), entirely lose their effect when stacked in the .pdf as a vertical pair. Are the aesthetics of the 10PRINT book non-incidental — are they in fact crucial — to the book’s argument? I think so, but I can’t yet fully explain why. The book dropped four days ago. For humanists that’s a nanosecond.

But it’s enough time for some of the book’s other audiences to already have logged many hundreds of lines of code and conversation, to have created, even, a “cheaty ProcessingJS” emulation of the BASIC maze (authored by Ph.D. candidate Kevin Brock). Humanists’ tools aren’t like that. Interpretation takes a while to warm in the fire. 10PRINT knows this. The book’s deft thematic weaving, its meld of ten voices into one, bespeaks patience, slowness.

For those familiar with the Commodore 64′s output, 10PRINT‘s dust jacket might seem a simple remediation of the maze produced by the book’s “mouthful” of a title. The cover illustration seems to be a white maze overlaying a blue screen, but it’s not. The white bits are made of shapes, Xs that shatter into repeating squares and broken rectangles. The “real” maze, made of forward slashes [/] and back slashes [\], printed on the book’s endpapers, is made to look faded and pixelated as if traveling through time: visually distressed like faux antiques whipped with chains to chip away at veneer.

Such a book coaxes humanists to open it.

Sure, there’s a lot of code. But if you were expecting 10PRINT to read as like a View Source window, you might be delighted (comforted?) to find familiar contexts and theories anchored in medium-specific practice of all kinds. Where programmers see forward and back slashes forming shapes that are functionally distinct — a maze is multicursal, with many paths through it, a labyrinth unicusal — the 10PRINT authors ask “would programming be meditating, dancing, escaping, solving, or architecting a maze? Would the user be Theseus or Daedalus?” (49).

Such questions seem like “bullshit” to some of the programmers on the Slashdot and Reddit 10 PRINT threads. But trash talking seems an ordinary part of hacker culture. It’s too early in 10PRINT’s reception to gauge the book’s success in creating conversations that “transcend” (xi) Twittersmack — er — disciplinary borders.

At the very least the book’s sudden and surprisingly popular reception indicates that 10PRINT is poised to be this year’s Debates in DH: a book regarded as field-defining, and about which conversation might continue all year long. Amazon’s stock of 10PRINT sold out in 3 days (see this handy chart to find your own hardback copy). The free .pdf available at 10print.org has logged over 12,000 downloads as of yesterday morning.

Though some programmers may deride BASIC as the language of “children and amateurs” (159), the authors were right to travel back to the future. They anticipated the overlapping needs of their various audiences accurately and with gusto.

Photo “Spread from 10 PRINT CHR$(205.5+RND(1)); : GOTO 10″ by Flickr user Casey REAS / All rights reserved.

Reeder: RSS Readers for iPad, iPhone, and Mac

Where do you go to find the latest information of your interests? Twitter may be the best place to find the constantly updated site of news and rumours, and Facebook Pages and groups start playing a similar role to seed out information to us. While these two sources are useful if we use them strategically, they can overwhelm us very easily because of their constant flow of massive amount of information.

I use Facebook Pages and Twitter to find some latest information, but these two sources may not be necessarily suitable to check if my favourites blogs like academiPad have published new posts or to see if news websites updated their content. Many of us likely have a handful of blogs and websites that we regularly follow, and if we check their update status one by one, it would take a lot of effort and time. To make this routine of checking blog and website update status more efficient, I use RSS feeds through Reeder.

 

What Is RSS?

RSS Icon

RSS, often dubbed as “Really Simple Syndication,” is a web feed format, and even if you’ve never used it, you most likely see RSS icons on news websites, blogs, and podcast pages. Its basic function is to send out updates as rss, xml, or atom formats. (For your information, Atom is an alternative to RSS and it is different from RSS, but their basic functions are the same.) If you’re subscribing to podcasts, for example, you may actually receiving the latest episodes of your favourite shows via RSS.

An advantage of using RSS feeds is to receive often summarized updates from your favourite news websites, blogs, journal websites, and so on. If you want to read more, you just need to click links or titles to go to the actual pages to read the entire posts or news articles. Unlike Twitter, you’ll receive more information because RSS feeds don’t have a 140 character limit, but like Facebook, the feeds contain images, videos, and even audio so the information you receive through them are more dynamic.

We have a wide range of RSS reader apps available, from Vienna RSS, to online Google Reader, to previously shareware but now freeware NetNewsWire (also for iPad, $10, iTunes link), to social media “magazine” Flipboard (free, iTunes link). Among many great apps,  I want to talk about my favourite app, Reeder (for Mac, for iPad, for iPhone).

 

What Is Reeder?

Reeder for Mac

Reeder for Mac

Reeder for iPad

Reeder for iPhone

I used to use Vienna RSS as my main reader until the beta version of Reeder for Mac came out. I started using Reeder for Mac and have been using all the versions – Mac ($5) , iPad ($5), and iPhone ($3, iTunes links) – since I got my iPad this year. The reason I’m using the same apps on the different platform is most likely for consistency, but I’m not using them just for this one reason. Here are a few reasons why I enjoy using these apps.

 

1. Sync with Google Reader

I originally didn’t like the idea of getting RSS feeds through Google Reader. I may be wrong but I think that there is some time lag between the feeds that Reeder receives and those that Google Reader receives: the feed updates are coming through Google Reader so this isn’t a surprise if it’s indeed true. Eventually, I realized the benefit of syncing with Google Reader.

What is the benefit? This does not apply to those who check RSS feeds on a single platform, but those who, like me, check them on multiple platforms most likely want all their devices to start on one device where you left on another. Through Google Reader, Reeder apps snyc both RSS feeds and the status of feeds–read, unread, starred/favourite. This means that all the read articles on Mac will have the same status on iPhone and/or iPad when you open the apps next time. If you check some feeds on Mac before leaving for school/work in the morning, you can start where you stop.

 

2. Appearance

I prefer a simple interface so that I can focus on checking RSS feeds. Those who like more visually appealing apps may want to check Flipboard instead. The iPad and Mac apps share similar interfaces while the iPhone has a divided/abbreviated interface. I like the off-white tone since it is least distracting and much nicer to eyes especially when you have to go through many feeds quickly.

Reader for Mac

Reader for iPad

Reader for iPhone

Reader for iPhone

While all the versions of Reeder have various ways to render feeds and their original pages, all the apps use Readability, which, like Instapaper, lets you save web pages for reading later and also render the pages into more reader-friendly layouts. As you may notice in the above images, all the versions have Readability icons within feed views and tapping them opens feed articles in Readability rendering. (Tapping the titles can open the original pages in Readability, Instapaper, and/or Google Mobilizer based on your settings.)

 

3. Functionality

As all the versions share similar functions, let me focus on the iPad app here.

Accounts

Services Panel

As you can see in these screenshots, Reeder allows you to share feeds with other very easily through other various services. If you use any of the services in Accounts, all you need to do is to turn on the service on Services Panel and to add your usernames in Accounts. From the share icon on the app interface, you can access these services.

Settings

Here is the settings page for Reeder for iPad. You can tweak all the details so that you can optimize your usability. A the bottom of image is the setting for sliding or swiping. As you may can expect, all the Reeder apps use up/down and left/right swipe motions to the full capacity. With my settings, swiping left on an article in a list will mark it as a starred, while swiping right will make it as a read/unread. In the article/feed view, swiping up goes back to the previous article, and down to the next one.

 

4. Drawbacks

I use all the versions of Reeder and I love them, but if you decide to use all of them, you have purchase them separately. In Canada, the iPhone app costs $ 2.99 and the other two $4.99: the total comes to $12.97 + tax, which isn’t really cheap. I bought them one by one gradually, so I didn’t feel like spending so much money on Reeder, but $12.97 + tax sounds a lot for a RSS reader.

If you decide to give a shot to Reeder, I recommend either the iPhone app or the Mac one. Why? Despite the price tag of $ 4.99, the iPad version is least functional. While the other two let you add new feed subscriptions on them, you can’t do that on iPad. Instead, you have to go to Google Reader to add new ones. The iPad version came out last, so I’m hoping the upcoming updates will add this function to the app, though.

 

5. Conclusion: Reeder merges functionality with great design

We have so many choices for RSS readers, and I can’t say that Reeder is the best app in the market since I’ve never tried that many apps (and can’t afford to purchase them just to try them). As a long-time Mac user, however, I can say that Reeder is up to the Mac standard: functionality with great interfaces. If you have never tried to use RSS, I highly recommend you to give it a shot: it can potentially save your time to go through all the latest updates.

Do you use RSS readers? If so, what apps do you use? What kinds of feeds do you receive?

 

About today’s Guest Lecturer: Masaki Kondo (twitter) is a PhD student in Cinema and Media Studies at York University. His academic research is in the field of experimental cinema with a particular emphasis on its theoretical integration into film theory. You can read more about his research interests and the educational use of technology on his blog Unruled Eyes

 

Disclaimer: This article contains affiliate links.

This post originally appeared on academiPad.com. Please visit academiPad for the original post, which might be updated or improved. Copyright 2010-2012 . All rights reserved.