|
FIG. 1. Predation on E. coli
biofilms by B. bacteriovorus. E. coli biofilms were
developed for 18 hrs in 96 well microtiter plates (pre-treatment),
followed by 24 hr exposure to B. bacteriovorus lysate (+ B.b.
) or a sterile lysate solution (- B.b. ), then rinsed and stained
with CV. Addition of B. bacteriovorus effectively reduces the
E. coli biofilm.
| Pretreated |
+ B.b. |
- B.b . |
|
FIG. 2. Visualizing biofilm
predation. Scanning electron micrographs taken after E. coli biofilms
were developed for 18 hrs on PVC plastic cover slip (pre-treatment)
and exposed for 24 hrs to a sterile lysate solution (- Bdellovibrio
) or B. bacteriovorus lysate (+ Bdellovibrio ). Arrow showing
attached B. bacteriovorus. Scale bar 2 m m. Once again, our
data show that addition of the predator effectively reduces
the bacterial biofilm.
Conclusions
- Our data suggest that growth in a biofilm does not eliminate
predation by Bdellovibrio , but allows a level of survival
from attack greater than that observed for planktonic cells.
- The methods developed in our lab should allow a more rigorous
assessment of the potential use of Bdellovibrio as a biocontrol
agent versus biofilms and its use as a tool to improve classical
biofilm control strategies.
In recent studies, we have also shown that another
bacterial predator, Micavibrio aeruginosavorus, also has the
ability to attack biofilms of a wide range of microbes. Daniel
Kadouri, a former post-doc in the lab, is continuing these studies
in his own lab at UMDNJ. Learn about his lab here.
From more information, please see:
Kadouri, D. and O'Toole G.A. 2005. Susceptibility
of biofilms to Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus attack. Appl Environ
Microbiol. 71:4044-51.
Kadouri D, Venzon NC, O'Toole GA. 2007.
Vulnerability of pathogenic biofilms to Micavibrio aeruginosavorus.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 73(2):605-14.
|