| Site ID: |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
70.1639 |
|
USA |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Coleville |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
-150.9292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
0 |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
57700 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
12-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
157 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
1 |
Ice covered |
Total runoff
this year: |
160 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
54 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
125.0 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
1884 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
1893 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Hughes,
Alas. (4103500) |
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
50305 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of summer monthly means from a station in the region;
ice-covered constant discharge of 54 m3/sec is assumed. |
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 149 |
|
|
2003 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.1 |
2.4 |
-3.7 |
20.0 |
62.5 |
47.5 |
15.9 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
2.5 |
|
|
|
| 179 |
|
|
2004 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
1.0 |
21.7 |
66.2 |
49.7 |
32.3 |
-6.6 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
|
|
|
| 170 |
|
|
2005 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
11.9 |
58.0 |
50.3 |
35.8 |
1.4 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
| 103 |
|
|
2006 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
-3.2 |
35.8 |
58.4 |
1.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 178 |
|
|
2007 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
32.5 |
62.0 |
53.2 |
42.6 |
-29.1 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
|
|
|
| 160 |
|
|
2008 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.4 |
-0.4 |
34.3 |
65.3 |
43.3 |
33.9 |
-29.2 |
1.1 |
2.5 |
|
|
|
| 166 |
|
|
2009 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
1.4 |
-0.7 |
34.6 |
60.1 |
46.2 |
21.2 |
-5.2 |
1.2 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
157 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
2.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|