|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
-17.5362 |
|
Zambia |
|
|
Western |
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Zambezi |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
24.6114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Sesheke |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
338827 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
8.92 |
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
26-Oct-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
58 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
58 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
314 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
104.5 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
5073 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
4354 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Kamativi
G/w (1491200) |
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
37973 |
sq km |
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of monthly means from a station in the region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
1.7 |
1.8 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
|
|
| 61 |
|
|
2003 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
3.1 |
14.4 |
20.8 |
5.5 |
2.5 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
|
|
| 76 |
|
|
2004 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
8.8 |
25.8 |
18.4 |
5.1 |
2.7 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
|
|
| 26 |
|
|
2005 |
2.2 |
1.9 |
2.5 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
2.5 |
0.2 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
|
|
| 36 |
|
|
2006 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.7 |
9.4 |
7.9 |
3.2 |
2.4 |
2.1 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
| 90 |
|
|
2007 |
2.1 |
13.1 |
28.2 |
20.0 |
9.5 |
3.7 |
2.6 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
|
|
| 58 |
|
|
2008 |
2.2 |
6.5 |
12.7 |
13.8 |
6.6 |
2.8 |
2.4 |
2.3 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
|
|
| 82 |
|
|
2009 |
2.3 |
2.8 |
23.5 |
29.9 |
11.0 |
3.6 |
2.6 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
58 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|