| Site ID: |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
47.2696 |
|
France |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Cher |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
1.7011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
0 |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
8817 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
13-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
500 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
531 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
90 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
78.6 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
304 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
302 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Blois
(6123300) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
40630 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of monthly means from a station in the region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 164 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
34.8 |
37.8 |
30.3 |
25.6 |
35.4 |
|
|
|
| 520 |
|
|
2003 |
39.1 |
36.5 |
39.2 |
50.2 |
73.2 |
71.0 |
63.4 |
35.2 |
25.7 |
25.3 |
25.0 |
36.2 |
|
|
|
| 524 |
|
|
2004 |
39.5 |
36.6 |
39.7 |
47.9 |
59.3 |
62.1 |
64.3 |
44.2 |
40.5 |
26.4 |
32.4 |
31.7 |
|
|
|
| 468 |
|
|
2005 |
37.6 |
39.4 |
37.2 |
47.6 |
57.4 |
65.8 |
8.1 |
40.6 |
37.2 |
28.8 |
31.7 |
36.7 |
|
|
|
| 424 |
|
|
2006 |
26.7 |
19.9 |
29.8 |
49.7 |
67.8 |
63.4 |
59.5 |
41.6 |
33.6 |
31.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 566 |
|
|
2007 |
31.6 |
32.4 |
54.7 |
64.2 |
67.3 |
69.3 |
62.1 |
51.0 |
43.4 |
37.4 |
29.5 |
22.9 |
|
|
|
| 531 |
|
|
2008 |
17.9 |
29.9 |
39.1 |
54.9 |
64.6 |
75.1 |
70.2 |
43.4 |
40.5 |
36.9 |
26.6 |
32.0 |
|
|
|
| 477 |
|
|
2009 |
23.9 |
32.2 |
33.6 |
52.9 |
72.8 |
65.4 |
62.9 |
46.9 |
37.6 |
35.7 |
13.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
506 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|