|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
48.3159 |
|
Austria |
|
|
Oberosterreich |
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Danube |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
14.0629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Aschach an der Donau |
|
Contributing
area: |
91283 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.50 |
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
13-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
470 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
549 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
1519 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
98.7 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
2741 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
2893 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Nagymaros
(6442500) |
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
182903 |
sq km |
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of monthly means from a station in the region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
| 164 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
31.2 |
31.1 |
32.2 |
33.5 |
36.1 |
|
|
| 455 |
|
|
2003 |
28.1 |
38.2 |
42.7 |
39.7 |
41.2 |
43.2 |
46.2 |
40.4 |
36.2 |
35.0 |
28.4 |
36.0 |
|
|
| 461 |
|
|
2004 |
47.2 |
39.8 |
34.6 |
41.5 |
41.9 |
43.5 |
41.0 |
37.2 |
28.4 |
32.6 |
35.2 |
38.2 |
|
|
| 478 |
|
|
2005 |
42.0 |
38.1 |
36.5 |
41.2 |
49.1 |
42.4 |
6.9 |
45.7 |
44.5 |
44.0 |
43.1 |
44.5 |
|
|
| 421 |
|
|
2006 |
44.1 |
19.8 |
25.3 |
45.4 |
47.4 |
47.6 |
52.9 |
49.2 |
43.9 |
45.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
| 534 |
|
|
2007 |
47.9 |
37.0 |
44.5 |
47.9 |
49.1 |
45.0 |
51.5 |
47.5 |
42.6 |
45.5 |
40.5 |
35.2 |
|
|
| 549 |
|
|
2008 |
43.5 |
42.3 |
47.1 |
42.0 |
51.3 |
48.3 |
52.3 |
49.5 |
45.5 |
46.2 |
41.8 |
39.7 |
|
|
| 449 |
|
|
2009 |
31.7 |
19.3 |
42.0 |
44.2 |
47.1 |
50.0 |
53.1 |
50.0 |
45.3 |
44.8 |
21.9 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
483 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
18.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
