|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
48.2687 |
|
Austria |
|
|
Oberosterreich |
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Danube |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
14.3674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Linz |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
95931 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.52 |
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
13-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
452 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
558 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
1721 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
91.9 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
3312 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
3236 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Nagymaros
(6442500) |
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
182903 |
sq km |
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of monthly means from a station in the region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
| 179 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
39.8 |
26.1 |
38.5 |
43.6 |
31.4 |
|
|
| 399 |
|
|
2003 |
26.5 |
11.8 |
23.7 |
34.4 |
44.1 |
44.2 |
43.1 |
40.8 |
36.7 |
34.9 |
29.3 |
30.0 |
|
|
| 380 |
|
|
2004 |
19.2 |
23.1 |
22.4 |
31.6 |
40.0 |
40.0 |
34.7 |
39.8 |
35.1 |
37.3 |
26.4 |
30.3 |
|
|
| 501 |
|
|
2005 |
35.6 |
31.5 |
19.6 |
43.8 |
57.6 |
47.6 |
6.4 |
53.8 |
52.3 |
53.6 |
47.4 |
52.2 |
|
|
| 419 |
|
|
2006 |
21.9 |
16.5 |
16.1 |
39.0 |
48.4 |
53.0 |
56.4 |
61.9 |
53.5 |
52.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
| 558 |
|
|
2007 |
55.1 |
31.7 |
43.8 |
44.8 |
46.1 |
53.7 |
64.9 |
61.3 |
50.3 |
47.1 |
35.5 |
23.6 |
|
|
| 558 |
|
|
2008 |
25.0 |
43.3 |
44.8 |
45.1 |
53.8 |
56.6 |
58.4 |
54.1 |
54.6 |
47.1 |
41.9 |
32.9 |
|
|
| 456 |
|
|
2009 |
19.9 |
14.0 |
36.0 |
48.4 |
53.7 |
45.7 |
60.7 |
57.8 |
50.8 |
46.0 |
22.9 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
469 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
35.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|