|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
48.3737 |
|
Austria |
|
|
Niederosterreich |
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Danube |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
15.8705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Krems an der Donau |
|
|
Contributing
area: |
111547 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.61 |
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
13-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
437 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
550 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
1889 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
111.7 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
3531 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
3499 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Nagymaros
(6442500) |
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
182903 |
sq km |
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of monthly means from a station in the region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
| 174 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
47.1 |
31.3 |
34.9 |
36.0 |
25.2 |
|
|
| 433 |
|
|
2003 |
26.1 |
19.8 |
32.9 |
35.8 |
37.1 |
50.6 |
58.7 |
51.0 |
37.0 |
31.0 |
25.4 |
27.1 |
|
|
| 455 |
|
|
2004 |
16.5 |
31.6 |
38.7 |
34.3 |
44.1 |
49.3 |
50.7 |
50.5 |
39.1 |
38.3 |
31.9 |
30.0 |
|
|
| 429 |
|
|
2005 |
34.4 |
29.5 |
29.6 |
34.1 |
51.3 |
46.1 |
4.1 |
50.8 |
42.5 |
40.0 |
32.2 |
34.5 |
|
|
| 391 |
|
|
2006 |
30.8 |
5.7 |
6.3 |
26.3 |
58.4 |
52.8 |
58.6 |
54.4 |
50.1 |
47.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
| 479 |
|
|
2007 |
29.5 |
26.8 |
32.4 |
39.4 |
49.3 |
53.8 |
53.5 |
52.0 |
40.5 |
38.4 |
31.1 |
31.7 |
|
|
| 550 |
|
|
2008 |
20.4 |
35.7 |
40.1 |
48.5 |
63.2 |
64.0 |
60.7 |
57.8 |
44.4 |
43.7 |
35.1 |
36.8 |
|
|
| 465 |
|
|
2009 |
26.2 |
13.0 |
43.1 |
40.2 |
59.4 |
51.6 |
66.6 |
58.2 |
48.6 |
37.1 |
21.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
456 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
17.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|