| Site ID: |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
38.7386 |
|
USA |
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Muscatatuck |
|
|
|
Long. |
-85.9127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Scottsburg |
|
|
Contributing
area: |
2450 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
12-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
384 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
914 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
3 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
434.3 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
909 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
955 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Tokwe
Confluence D/s C/s (1495240) |
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
7280 |
sq mi |
23237 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Comparison station is
placeholder, only; this site is not yet calibrated to actual discharge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 84 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
3.0 |
14.3 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
59.2 |
|
|
|
| 219 |
|
|
2003 |
24.2 |
13.1 |
30.6 |
7.0 |
12.3 |
3.4 |
83.9 |
17.6 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
2.9 |
17.0 |
|
|
|
| 336 |
|
|
2004 |
46.5 |
34.3 |
6.3 |
6.4 |
70.3 |
108.1 |
10.3 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
9.5 |
34.0 |
3.6 |
|
|
|
| 383 |
|
|
2005 |
119.7 |
5.0 |
17.5 |
93.8 |
23.4 |
4.2 |
0.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
4.1 |
104.4 |
|
|
|
| 586 |
|
|
2006 |
57.9 |
3.6 |
370.2 |
114.4 |
19.6 |
4.4 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 395 |
|
|
2007 |
192.3 |
53.9 |
85.6 |
5.4 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
33.2 |
|
|
|
| 914 |
|
|
2008 |
61.4 |
82.8 |
419.0 |
218.5 |
69.6 |
21.2 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
22.4 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
| 196 |
|
|
2009 |
3.6 |
72.8 |
4.1 |
25.6 |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
31.4 |
3.5 |
23.9 |
20.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|