| Site ID: |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
38.9148 |
|
USA |
|
|
Indiana |
|
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
White |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
-87.0776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Newberry |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
12802 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
6-Jan-10 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
326 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
917 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
3 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
1.8 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
2627 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
2539 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Tokwe
Confluence D/s C/s (1495240) |
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
7280 |
sq mi |
23237 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Comparison station is
placeholder, only; this site is not yet calibrated to actual discharge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
2.7 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
| 226 |
|
|
2003 |
1.9 |
5.3 |
25.9 |
33.5 |
108.7 |
26.1 |
9.8 |
0.9 |
10.3 |
0.7 |
1.9 |
0.7 |
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
|
2004 |
16.5 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
2.1 |
23.2 |
15.6 |
1.1 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
2.0 |
0.7 |
|
|
|
| 336 |
|
|
2005 |
30.0 |
0.6 |
3.5 |
63.3 |
92.7 |
16.6 |
0.1 |
3.9 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
35.5 |
88.4 |
|
|
|
| 597 |
|
|
2006 |
49.4 |
23.9 |
175.8 |
123.0 |
110.4 |
87.4 |
5.8 |
11.9 |
0.7 |
8.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 405 |
|
|
2007 |
113.2 |
28.4 |
103.4 |
95.0 |
20.1 |
7.0 |
2.9 |
6.6 |
1.2 |
7.1 |
1.9 |
18.7 |
|
|
|
| 917 |
|
|
2008 |
16.9 |
38.1 |
135.5 |
186.6 |
164.4 |
244.8 |
83.6 |
19.0 |
6.8 |
0.7 |
2.7 |
18.2 |
|
|
|
| 669 |
|
|
2009 |
10.2 |
86.5 |
61.6 |
132.8 |
185.2 |
97.5 |
17.8 |
22.6 |
0.7 |
5.4 |
26.1 |
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|