| Site ID: |
|
|
2508 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
21.4908 |
|
Mexcio |
|
|
Veracruz |
|
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Tempoal |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
-98.4063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Tempoal |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
5184 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
13-Oct-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
153 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
154 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
25 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
49.7 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
108 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
113 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Las
Adjuntas (4358300) |
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
86315 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of monthly means from a station in the region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 183 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
11.2 |
131.9 |
12.9 |
14.2 |
12.6 |
|
|
|
| 182 |
|
|
2003 |
12.5 |
10.6 |
9.9 |
14.7 |
12.3 |
21.4 |
21.8 |
21.1 |
21.2 |
11.7 |
9.8 |
15.0 |
|
|
|
| 143 |
|
|
2004 |
15.3 |
14.7 |
8.3 |
5.8 |
6.1 |
19.2 |
13.1 |
10.0 |
8.6 |
14.1 |
13.8 |
14.3 |
|
|
|
| 152 |
|
|
2005 |
12.2 |
12.6 |
16.7 |
16.6 |
14.0 |
11.1 |
3.0 |
9.8 |
10.8 |
12.3 |
14.7 |
17.9 |
|
|
|
| 101 |
|
|
2006 |
13.4 |
10.3 |
10.3 |
7.1 |
8.6 |
9.6 |
10.5 |
8.8 |
7.6 |
15.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 189 |
|
|
2007 |
13.0 |
12.6 |
11.0 |
9.3 |
12.4 |
23.0 |
39.0 |
18.8 |
14.6 |
13.6 |
11.0 |
10.6 |
|
|
|
| 154 |
|
|
2008 |
13.5 |
12.1 |
10.9 |
7.6 |
13.3 |
15.8 |
14.5 |
11.1 |
17.7 |
13.9 |
11.8 |
11.8 |
|
|
|
| 134 |
|
|
2009 |
15.6 |
13.6 |
12.9 |
13.4 |
13.5 |
9.9 |
12.4 |
28.9 |
8.9 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
153 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
9.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|