| Site ID: |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
13.8448 |
|
Cambodia |
|
Preah
Vihear |
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Sen |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
104.8285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Bahal |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
4844 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
10-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
148 |
mm |
(2003-2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
151 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
3 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
23 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
117.0 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
127 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
118 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Ban Chot
(2969082) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
11886 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 85 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
9.3 |
24.5 |
31.0 |
10.7 |
9.3 |
|
|
|
| 121 |
|
|
2003 |
9.3 |
7.5 |
11.2 |
10.1 |
10.1 |
10.8 |
11.0 |
10.9 |
11.8 |
10.9 |
7.6 |
10.0 |
|
|
|
| 123 |
|
|
2004 |
8.3 |
8.7 |
10.5 |
8.3 |
9.7 |
11.1 |
10.2 |
17.7 |
9.4 |
10.3 |
8.5 |
9.9 |
|
|
|
| 136 |
|
|
2005 |
8.9 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
12.5 |
13.2 |
12.8 |
10.9 |
9.7 |
21.8 |
11.0 |
9.8 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
| 141 |
|
|
2006 |
8.3 |
7.8 |
10.1 |
11.0 |
9.9 |
9.2 |
11.3 |
13.9 |
25.0 |
34.7 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 163 |
|
|
2007 |
9.3 |
8.4 |
14.6 |
12.1 |
13.5 |
8.4 |
9.9 |
33.6 |
21.7 |
12.2 |
10.1 |
9.6 |
|
|
|
| 151 |
|
|
2008 |
9.0 |
7.9 |
11.8 |
13.0 |
11.0 |
10.4 |
10.7 |
15.6 |
31.2 |
11.4 |
9.4 |
10.2 |
|
|
|
| 194 |
|
|
2009 |
10.4 |
7.9 |
10.9 |
16.7 |
16.3 |
10.7 |
25.2 |
16.4 |
37.0 |
37.8 |
4.9 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
|
|
2010 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff (mm): |
9 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
76.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated via a rating equation directly from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|