| Site ID: |
|
|
2318 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
-18.4861 |
|
Australia |
|
|
Western
Australia |
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Fitzroy |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
124.6640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Noonkanbah |
|
|
Contributing
area: |
67661 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
1.35 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
6-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
148 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
53 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
-28 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
89.6 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
11228 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
11269 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Fitzroy
Crossing (5608024) |
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
7280 |
sq mi |
50014 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on monthly mean, maximum, and minimum M/C compared to gaging station
discharge values. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
5.5 |
3.9 |
3.0 |
3.5 |
1.7 |
|
|
|
| 109 |
|
|
2003 |
2.1 |
14.3 |
64.9 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
2.6 |
1.9 |
2.6 |
1.5 |
1.9 |
7.8 |
2.6 |
|
|
|
| 134 |
|
|
2004 |
6.2 |
29.9 |
60.5 |
7.5 |
3.8 |
5.1 |
5.7 |
6.0 |
5.2 |
2.2 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
|
|
|
| 65 |
|
|
2005 |
3.8 |
8.1 |
1.7 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.2 |
2.4 |
2.7 |
3.5 |
0.8 |
17.0 |
16.0 |
|
|
|
| 161 |
|
|
2006 |
30.3 |
85.2 |
26.6 |
4.7 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
2.8 |
2.2 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 273 |
|
|
2007 |
41.8 |
16.0 |
56.6 |
101.3 |
10.0 |
4.9 |
10.0 |
9.3 |
8.9 |
12.4 |
2.0 |
-0.5 |
|
|
|
| 53 |
|
|
2008 |
12.1 |
15.7 |
5.7 |
3.1 |
0.6 |
-0.9 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
-1.1 |
-0.1 |
1.7 |
18.4 |
|
|
|
| 359 |
|
|
2009 |
78.5 |
269.6 |
12.5 |
2.4 |
-0.9 |
-0.8 |
-0.9 |
-0.8 |
-0.7 |
-1.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|