| Site ID: |
|
|
1261 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
-22.6127 |
|
Mozambique |
|
Gaza |
|
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Changane |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
33.0605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Chigubo |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
16472 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
0.98 |
|
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
2-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
115 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
80 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
36 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
65.5 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
307 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
321 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value
analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Tokwe
Confluence U/s C/s (1495200) |
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
7280 |
sq mi |
16866 |
sq km |
|
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on monthly mean, maximum, and minimum M/C compared to gaging station
discharge values. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
|
| 94 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
17.2 |
16.4 |
23.9 |
21.0 |
15.1 |
|
|
|
| 205 |
|
|
2003 |
9.6 |
6.9 |
37.2 |
29.0 |
21.7 |
18.6 |
19.6 |
14.9 |
13.3 |
13.8 |
9.6 |
10.5 |
|
|
|
| 145 |
|
|
2004 |
7.2 |
6.0 |
29.9 |
18.7 |
13.3 |
12.3 |
11.6 |
11.6 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
9.1 |
7.7 |
|
|
|
| 76 |
|
|
2005 |
9.1 |
5.9 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
6.1 |
5.2 |
0.6 |
4.8 |
5.0 |
6.5 |
8.1 |
10.8 |
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
|
2006 |
6.8 |
4.9 |
6.3 |
5.2 |
6.0 |
6.7 |
6.0 |
5.8 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
| 90 |
|
|
2007 |
8.5 |
7.1 |
7.8 |
7.4 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
5.8 |
6.2 |
5.6 |
7.0 |
8.1 |
13.5 |
|
|
|
| 80 |
|
|
2008 |
10.0 |
4.9 |
5.7 |
4.6 |
5.4 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
5.3 |
5.7 |
6.4 |
7.1 |
15.5 |
|
|
|
| 64 |
|
|
2009 |
18.7 |
5.3 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
5.8 |
4.7 |
4.8 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
5.7 |
0.9 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|