|
|
|
1029 |
|
|
|
|
Lat. |
34.1871 |
|
USA |
|
|
Texas |
|
|
|
| River: |
|
|
Red |
|
|
|
|
Long. |
-98.9422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Site name: |
|
Vernon |
|
|
|
Contributing
area: |
52628 |
km2 |
Ratio to Comparison
Station: |
2.23 |
|
|
|
| Latest measurement: |
15-Nov-09 |
|
|
|
Mean annual
runoff: |
354 |
mm |
(2003-2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hydrologic status: |
|
2 |
Normal flow |
Total runoff
this year: |
346 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Latest M/C ratio: |
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
Seven day
total: |
1 |
mm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estimated current discharge: |
601 |
m3/sec |
|
Percent of
mean 7-day total: |
92.3 |
% |
(today's value compared to
mean for same period, 2003-2007) |
|
| Ice-cover determination: |
|
|
5 yr
recurrence flood: |
1174 |
m3/sec |
(from Log Pearson III analysis) |
|
|
|
|
| Status Codes: 1 = Low
flow, 2 = Normal flow, 3 = Flood, 4 = Major Flood |
|
1155 |
m3/sec |
(from Gumbel Extreme Value analysis) |
|
|
|
| Comparison Station Information: |
Ruliff,
Tex. (4150700) |
|
|
|
|
|
Contributing
Area: |
|
sq mi |
23585 |
sq km |
|
| (Data from this gaging station are used for the calibration to
discharge, with an adjustment for different contributing areas) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Notes: |
Rating equation is based
on comparison of monthly means from a station in the region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge and runoff, based on satellite remote sensing (NASA
AMSR-E data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (For U.S, sites, nearby ground station discharge may also be
shown) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Annual |
|
|
|
Monthly Total Runoff (mm),
computed from above satellite-based discharge data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Runoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (mm) |
|
|
|
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
April |
May |
June |
July |
Aug |
Sept |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
|
| 162 |
|
|
2002 |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
no data |
28.1 |
23.6 |
36.5 |
35.7 |
37.7 |
|
|
| 397 |
|
|
2003 |
37.2 |
32.3 |
36.1 |
35.5 |
35.9 |
34.9 |
32.5 |
29.3 |
30.6 |
31.6 |
27.9 |
33.0 |
|
|
| 412 |
|
|
2004 |
32.5 |
35.1 |
33.5 |
33.6 |
35.9 |
35.8 |
33.0 |
36.7 |
30.7 |
37.2 |
31.9 |
35.6 |
|
|
| 325 |
|
|
2005 |
32.1 |
26.5 |
30.4 |
31.4 |
27.5 |
19.8 |
3.0 |
29.6 |
28.3 |
29.8 |
33.7 |
32.9 |
|
|
| 242 |
|
|
2006 |
30.5 |
27.4 |
27.4 |
16.3 |
21.3 |
22.5 |
21.4 |
20.2 |
21.9 |
33.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
| 393 |
|
|
2007 |
26.7 |
31.8 |
33.3 |
33.4 |
40.3 |
36.2 |
35.7 |
31.7 |
31.8 |
31.7 |
31.1 |
29.5 |
|
|
| 346 |
|
|
2008 |
32.5 |
28.7 |
28.3 |
27.8 |
27.9 |
27.0 |
29.8 |
26.8 |
29.0 |
28.6 |
31.1 |
28.3 |
|
|
| 299 |
|
|
2009 |
31.5 |
28.4 |
24.8 |
25.0 |
27.5 |
33.6 |
31.7 |
30.3 |
24.0 |
25.0 |
17.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean Annual Runoff: |
4 |
|
Standard Deviation: |
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend in Annual Runoff
(slope): |
-11.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discharge is estimated directly via a rating equation from
the remote sensing data (M/C ratio) shown below. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|