![]() | ||||
|
Back to submissions |
chris barbieri: Topic 7: Are There Limits to Science? The question of limits to science is a complex one that deserves a great deal of thought. I thought group 7 did a good job of exposing some issues that are inextricably involved in this idea. Personally, I have a lot of interest in this matter. It is intriguing to try to grasp a world where science has ceased to be a useful method of interpreting one's environment. This in itself is an issue that must be considered: that science is only one reference frame with which to view one's world. The question then is, "What developments could actually lie outside the scope of science?" Essentially, this question is unanswerable, because there is nothing in the wrold today that truly cannot be examined or dealt with by science; therefore, if there is something outside the scope of scientific thought, the modern human mind us not likely to be able to conceptualize it. Another question involving the limits of science is ot what if something makes science obsolete, but what if science makes itself obsolete? The ultimate goal of scientific exploration, some would say, is to eventually reach a point where all knowledge has been conquered, and all phenomena explained. Basically, it is a point where we know EVERYTHING. Is this likely to happen? I believe the answer is a resounding know. The history of science has continually shown us that the scope of the universe is always much larger than we believe. Just when a field of science seems like it has exhausted its horizons, like physics in the era before relativity and quantum mechanics, something will come along and show us just how ignorant we really are about what is really going on in the world. In addition, the forward progression of science leades not to stagnation, but further branching and specialization as small sub-field become hut new branches of science in their own right, similar to biochemistry. Group 7 did a good job of getting us thinking about these things, which is the point of these presentations after all. For this, they should be commended. |
|||