![]() | ||||
|
Back to submissions |
Tom Kirkpatrick: Topic 7: Are There Limits to Science? The group did a respectable job in presenting their topic although at times I found it a bit slow. The old addage of "keep it simple" always applies to presentations although I know it's difficult to edit out all the great material you discover during your research of the topic. There were times where your presenters were putting out relevent material but it tended to drag a bit and once you've caused an audiences atttnetion to wander its tough to ge it back. Spice it up!! My view on whether or not there are limits to science is no! Science is limitless. Even though we can think that we have discovered the smallest particle or the furthest point in the cosmos or unraveled the greatest mystery there is always a greater challenge just over the horizon. I think it is very precoscious of us if we believe our current science is the end all be all of discovery and exploration. As many things as we can think of that we feel we have mastered one could easily think of many many more that lie still untouched. Additionally, all of the accepted scientific foundations could eadily be proven to be incorrect and an entirely new dimension to science would quickly form. What if tomorrow some genius discovers that all of Newton's laws are fundamentally flawed and a search for a new set of rules msut be initiated. The possibilities are endless. Just look at how many species lie undiscovered right here in earth's oceans. Now consider that the universe is infinite and wonder how long it may take to explore all of the universe's planets and oceans. Endless I say.......! |
|||