![]() | ||||
|
Back to submissions |
Maya Lodish: Topic 7: Are There Limits to Science? When I try to conceptualize the idea of
reaching a limit to science, two questions
come to mind. Would we reach a concrete
limit because the universe has a limit and
we will have figured out all there is to
know up to this endpoint? Asking a
question from a different perspective on
limits, one wonders if we will eventually
reach a limit in terms of our own capacity
to understand the world around us, perhaps
it is full of complexities that we as a
human race will always be unable to grasp?
Approaching either of these limits of
science seems unlikely to me.
As for the universe having a
discrete amount of knowledge that we will
be able to attain, I picture the universe
as incredibly vast, with galaxies beyond
ours of which we know little. Why do I
have this image that there is so much left
to discover that it is overwhelming to
imagine understanding it all ? Does it
come from my imagination? As Friday's
presenters pointed pout, imagination and
speculation do not equal potential
knowledge.
As for the assumption that we
will reach a finite capacity of our human
ability to understand the universe, I
can't picture this happening for the very
reason that new discoveries in science
always bring up new questions, and new
ways of looking at these questions. I
would not argue that we will be able to
understand all of the secrets of the
universe, but I would assert that we will
not stop attempting to understand the
universe. Science is constantly in flux as
new ideas are born which incorporate
different sources of knowledge, both old
and new. The nature of the questions we
ask changes with the times, as our
perceptions of the existing possibilities
change. For instance, who would have
imagined in the sixteenth century that we
would be able to fly in airplanes, or put
a man on the moon? I would guess that in a
few thousand years, people will ask
similar questions of us. It would be
arrogant to assume that we will ever know
all there is to know, and to me it would
be a frightening world if there was no
room for wonder. When I think of my view
on the limits of science, what comes to
mind is an image of the vastness of the
universe, of how small I feel when I look
into the night sky. I would almost not
want us to ever reach a point when we stop
wondering what secrets the universe holds.
I fear that if we reached this point, we
might lose our perspective as being a
smaller part of a larger whole. The idea
of unlimited knowledge carries with it an
image of omniscient control of time and
space, that is almost god-like and to me
very unrealistic.
|
|||