|
Richard N.
Downer
Re: Can we reduce
the acidic contribution of TP-3 without compromising its historic
integrity?
The following ideas are
for your consideration. Not having pictures of TP-3, the following
concept was developed from memory and by referencing the following
two drawings:
Final Draft, Environmental
Response Alternatives Analysis Report, Section 5, Figure 5-10,
"Conceptual Drawing of Alternative 4." The photographic
background of this sheet shows the extent of vegetation cover
on the northwest corner of TP-3 in the vicinity of Tyson shafts
# 1 and # 2.
Engineering Evaluation/Cost
Analysis (EE/CA), Figure 3-1, "Tailings Pile 3 Elizabeth
Mine." This sheet shows the location of High Sulfide Content
tailings superimposed over a contour map.
Special features to
note:
On Figure 3-1, note
the former mine road that now serves as the driveway for the
Parker property. This road extends south west from Mine Road
almost to the north end of the North Cut, passing through the
lower fourth of the High Sulfide Content tailings area.
On Figure 5-10, note
the extent of vegetative cover. A thick stand of trees and shrubs
seem to extend along the downhill side of the former mine road.
This vegetation seems to cover the steep area between the former
mine road and the lower demarcation line for the High Sulfide
Content tailings area.
On Figure 5-10, the
upper demarcation line of the High Sulfide Content tailings
area is the lower edge of a vegetated area extending all the
way up to the Tyson Shaft # 2.
Conclusions:
The vegetated area
below the former mine road (extension of Parkers driveway)
is very steep.
The lower one-fourth
of the High Sulfide Content tailings area of TP-3 is already
covered with vegetation.
The High Sulfide Content
tailings rise about 20 meters (60 feet) above the former mine
road (extension of Parkers driveway). This area composes
about three-fourths of the High Sulfide Content tailings area.
The vegetation already
in place on the High Sulfide Content tailings area blocks the
view of the barren upper north west portion of TP-3. The barren
portions of TP-3 above the former mine road (extension of Parkers
driveway) can not be seen from Copperas Road (Class IV Road)
or from Mine Road.
The barren upper north
west portion of TP-3 can only be seen well while facing due
North, standing high up on TP-3, adjacent to the North Cut.
Suggestions:
Cap and isolate the
barren High Sulfide Content tailings area above the former mine
road (extension of Parkers driveway).
Collect the uncontaminated
surface runoff from the capped area and bypass it to Copperas
Brook
Use the upper most
membrane anchor trench as a groundwater cutoff trench to lessen
the percolation of groundwater under the upper three-fourths
of the High Sulfide Content tailings.
Do not disturb the
lower one-fourth section of High Sulfide Content tailings or
the vegetation below the former mine road (extension of Parkers
driveway).
Three historical features
shown on Figure 3-1 might be covered - a timber floor, timber
and a ladderway. It may be possible to change the local ground
contours around these features to allow each of them to remain
exposed.
Construct a bypass
channel along the north edge of upper High Sulfide Content tailings
of TP-3 to collect the uncontaminated surface water. At Copperas
Road (Class IV Road) put this uncontaminated water into a pipe
and direct it down to the proposed north diversion channel around
TP2 and 1 from which it can eventually enter Copperas Brook.
Reasoning:
This capping action
would reduce the exposure of the High Sulfide Content tailings
area by three-fourths. Thus, greatly reducing the amount of
acid mine drainage flowing off the High Sulfide Content tailings
area of TP-3 and requiring treatment.
This capping action
would have little effect on compromising the visual effect of
TP-3 since most of the re-worked area is now and would remain
hidden from view.
This capping action
would maintain the current vegetation on some of the steepest
portions of TP-3. The undisturbed vegetation would act as a
screen for the newly capped area.
How?
Along the uphill edge
of the former mine road (extension of Parkers driveway)
construct a deep cutoff trench. The downhill side would be lined
with a geomembrane. The rest of the trench would be lined with
a geotextile filter fabric and then filled with crushed rock.
This trench would act as a cutoff for groundwater percolating
down slope under the High Sulfide Content tailings. The trench
bottom would slope gently downhill parallel to the former mine
road where it would intersect the proposed collection channel
on the north side of TP-3.
Rather than smooth
the High Sulfide Content tailings, I propose that they be benched.
Beginning at the top of the slope, at the upper boundary with
the current vegetation, a bench would be excavated into the
tailings such that the top of the bench was about 8 to 10 feet
wide (room enough for an excavator to work) and sloped back
into the hill at a 5% slope, while following the contour of
the land gently downward parallel to the former mine road.
The work would step
down about 8 vertical feet and a second bench would be excavated
parallel to the first. All excavated material would be hauled
to the top of TP-1 and placed inside a bermed area until it
could be properly graded and covered. Only sufficient material
would be removed to form the benches. The tailings on the faces
of the benches would not be disturbed.
As soon as two benches
were configured, the first (upper) bench top and face would
be capped. This method of construction would minimize the time
for exposure of the tailings should a rain storm hit during
construction. In the event of rain, the benches tops would act
as wide, shallow swales, directing the surface flow toward the
previously installed perimeter diversion ditch.
Whatever capping system
is finally chosen for TP-1 and -2, a similar system could be
used on the bench tops. The faces, being steeper, might have
to be covered with carefully placed riprap or gabions. The entire
slope would eventually be capped. However, instead of appearing
as a uniform slope, it would appear as a stepped slope.
When the capping and
slope benching finishes at the surface of the former mine road
(extension of Parkers driveway), the road itself would
also be re-graded with a 5% back slope, capped and topped with
a wearing course of stone.
Why the Benches?
Benching will lessen
the tension on the geosynthetic clay liner and the geomembrane,
since the heavy cover material on the 10-foot wide back slopes
will act as an anchor for the geomembrane on the faces. Benching
will also break up the slope making it easier to re-vegetate
the back slopes.
The tailings need
to be re-graded before a cap can be applied. Re-grading to a
uniform slope would simultaneously expose large areas to the
weather. Because of the steepness of the surrounding land, it
would not be as easy to re-grade in strips as is proposed for
TP-1, should it be cut back to a 1V : 3H slope.
If the tailings remain
undisturbed below the former mine road, then there is no space
for a temporary sedimentation basin. Whereas, benching would
allow the regrading and capping to proceed in an orderly fashion
on a small portion of the area at a time. Each bench top could
become a small temporary sedimentation basin with the addition
of silt fencing and hay bales.
.
top
|