| On Doctoring MEDLINE searches, with reference librarian comments |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The question was
"A look at Polio and studies done on Polio
immunization and/or vaccination programs in Africa"1 : exp brain diseases/ and exp poliomyelitis/ and {59}
Poliomyelitis, bulbar/
2 : limit 1 to (local holdings and human and english language) {29}
3 : limit 2 to yr=1990-1999 {10}
4 : exp immunization programs/ or Preventive health services/ {5304}
5 : 3 and 4 {0}
6 : limit 5 to english language {0}
7 : limit 6 to (local holdings and human and english language) {0}
8 : 4 {5304}
9 : limit 8 to (local holdings and human and english language) {2570}
10 : limit 9 to yr=1990-1999 {1556}
11 : limit 10 to ebm reviews {5}
12 : exp Poliomyelitis/ {5232}
13 : Immunization/ {27033}
14 : 12 and 13 {260}
15 : limit 14 to (local holdings and human and english language) {161}
16 : limit 15 to yr=1990-1999 {39}
17 : exp Vaccines/ {62861}
18 : 12 and 17 {1749}
19 : limit 18 to (local holdings and human and english language {374}
and yr=1990-1999)
20 : exp Africa/ {71890}
21 : (16 or 19) and 20 {44}
22 : from 21 keep 1-3,6,13,15-16,18-20,22,24-25,31,37,41-42 {17}
23 : from 21 keep 42 {1}
24 : from 21 keep 1-3,13,15-16,18-20,25,31,42 {12}
25 : from 24 keep 1-12 {12}
Reference Librarian comments
I'm sure you now understand why set #1 was a disaster. You were
ANDing those subjects, getting more restrictive with every thought.
You were doing good Medline experimentation. At set #12, you're on
the right track. Great job. When you've searched for 20 years, you
can get it down to a terse, haiku-like shortness, like this:1 : exp *poliomyelitis/pc,ep [Prevention and control; Epidemiology]
2 : exp africa/
3 : 1 and 2 (79 references)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |