Conclusions

Although the techniques for cell culture developed in this section are

not fully reproducible, the observation that axons can be grown from

cultured C. elegans neurons is encouraging and suggests that further

optimization should be attempted. Techniques developed for mass culture

of all embryonic cells could form the basis for culture of specific

neuronal types. Experiments in Drosophila suggest that the isolation

and culture of specific cell types from a population of dissociated

embryonic cells might be possible. Krasnow and colleagues (1991) used

a beta-galactosidase substrate, FDG, that can be introduced into living

cells and releases a fluorescein molecule when cleaved. They

dissociated populations of transgenic Drosophila embryos carrying lacZ

fusions, including a neuron-specific enhancer trap line, stained with

FDG, and isolated a population of lacZ-expressing cells by

fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Neurons isolated by this technique

survived and sent out axons. This technique could probably be used in

C. elegans in conjunction with neuron-specific lacZ or GFP fusions to isolate

specific neuronal populations for culture. If neurons can grow at low

density (perhaps with conditioning factors released into the medium by

cells in denser cultures), the interactions of particular cells might be

studied both in culture and intact worms. In particular, unc-30/lacZ

fusions might be used to isolate DD neurons, which in embryos send out

processes that change direction or stop when they contact the cell body

of the adjacent DB or process of the adjacent DD neuron (Durbin, 1987)

.

Another potential use for C. elegans cell culture is in the study of

the electrical properties of neurons and muscle cells. The

electrophysiology of cultured Drosophila neurons, which are similar in

size to the C. elegans cultured cells described above, has been studied

by intracellular and patch recording techniques (Wu et al., 1983) . An

attempt to establish patch clamps with C. elegans cells was unsuccessful

(D. Raizen, E. Jorgensen, B. Sawin, and L. Bloom, unpublished results),

due largely to the poor adhesion of the cells to the coverslip.

Improvements in the culture technique could permit electrophysiological

analysis of a variety of mutants with defects in the regulation of

muscle contraction (Levin and Horvitz, 1992) , calcium channels (L.

Lobel, personal communication), anaesthetic sensitivity (P. Morgan,

personal communication), etc.

Finally, vertebrate cell culture techniques have been used to quantify

the elongation of axons on other axonal substrates (for example, see

Chang et al., 1987 ), and it is possible that the C. elegans culture

techniques can be applied to the study of fasciculation. In particular,

it would be interesting to determine whether axons from mutants

defective in fasciculation in vivo--unc-34, unc-71, and unc-76--are

unusual in their fasciculation behavior in vitro. Genetic mosaic

experiments for the study of fasciculation are difficult in vivo because

neighboring neurons are often closely related by lineage, but an in

vitro fasciculation assay would offer an opportunity to test the cell

autonomy of the fasciculation defects observed in these mutants.

While the important parameters for successful C. elegans cell culture

are not well understood, it is encouraging that cells can be isolated

and cultured in the short term with a reasonable degree of

reproducibility. The observation of neurons growing in defined

conditions required further refinement of these techniques to allow

lower-density cell culture (perhaps with the addition of conditioned

medium from C. elegans cultures). The requirement for a TESPA substrate

suggests that the isolated cells were poorly adhesive, and

investigations of fasciculation or of the effects of specific substrates

on axonal growth (e.g., the laminin-related protein Unc-6 (Ishii et al.,

1992) require isolation techniques that yield healthier cells.

Nevertheless, the initial success of these culture experiments suggest

that further investigation can yield a useful technique.

References

Banker, G. and K. Goslin. 1991. Culturing Nerve Cells. (Cambridge, MIT

Press).

Beadle, D. J., G. Lees, and S. B. Kater. 1988. Cell Culture Approaches

to Invertebrate Neuroscience. (London, Academic Press).

Bray, D. and K. Chapman. 1985. Analysis of microspike movements on the

neuronal growth cone. J. Neurosci. 5:3204-3213.

Chang, S., F. G. Rathjen, and J. A. Raper. 1987. Extension of neurites

on axons is impaired by antibodies against specific neural cell surface

glycoproteins. J. Cell Biol. 104:355-362.

Chiquet, M. and S. E. Acklin. 1986. Attachment to ConA or

extracellular matrix initiates rapid sprouting by cultured leech

neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA. 83:6188-6192.

Durbin, R. 1987. Studies on the development and organisation of the

nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Ph.D. Thesis, University of

Cambridge.

Goldstein, B. 1992. Induction of gut in Caenorhabditis elegans

embryos. Nature 357:255-257.

Hedgecock, E. M., J. G. Culotti, D. H. Hall, and B. D. Stern. 1987.

Genetics of cell and axon migrations in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Development. 100:365-82.

Hyman, A. A. 1989. Centrosome movement in the early divisions of

Caenorhabditis elegans: a cortical site determining centrosome position.

J Cell Biol. 109:1185-93.

Ishii, N., W. G. Wadsworth, B. D. Stern, J. G. Culotti, and E. M.

Hedgecock. 1992. UNC-6, a laminin-related protein, guides cell and

pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Neuron. 9:873-881.

Krasnow, M. A., S. Cumberledge, G. Manning, L. A. Herzenberg, and G. P.

Nolan. 1991. Whole animal cell sorting of Drosophila embryos.

Science. 251:81-85.

Leung-Hagesteijn, C., A. M. Spence, G. D. Stern, Y. Zhou, M.-W. Su, E.

M. Hedgecock, and J. G. Culotti. 1992. UNC-5, a transmembrane protein

with immunoglobulin and thrombospondin type 1 domains, guides cell and

pioneer axon migrations in C. elegans. Cell. 71:289-299.

Levin, J. L. and H. R. Horvitz. 1992. The Caenorhabditis elegans

unc-93 gene encodes a putative transmembrane protein that regulates

muscle contraction. Journal of Cell Biology. 117:143-155.

Nolan, G. P., S. Fiering, J. F. Nicolas, and L. A. Herzenberg. 1988.

Fluorescence-activated cell analysis and sorting of viable mammalian

cells based on b-D-galactosidase activity after transduction of

Escherichia coli lacZ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:2603-2607.

Siddiqui, S. S. 1990. Mutations affecting axonal growth and guidance

of motor neurons and mechanosensory neurons in the nematode

Caenorhabditis elegans. Neurosci Res Suppl. 13:

Siddiqui, S. S., E. Aamodt, F. Rastinejad, and J. Culotti. 1989.

Anti-tubulin monoclonal antibodies that bind to specific neurons in

Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 9:2963-72.

Siddiqui, S. S. and J. G. Culotti. 1991. Examination of neurons in

wild type and mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans using antibodies to

horseradish peroxidase. J Neurogenet.. 7:193-211.

Wu, C. F., N. Suzuki, and M. M. Poo. 1983. Dissociated neurons from

normal and mutant Drosophila larval central nervous system in cell

culture. J. Neurosci. 3:1888-1899.


Return to C. elegans Protocols
Return to Main Index